The medical profession will face many challenges in the new millenium. As medicine looks forward to advances in molecular
genetics and the prospect of unprecedented understanding of the causes and cures of human disease, clinicians, scientists,
and bioethicists may benefit from reflection on the origins of the medical ethos and its relevance to postmodern medicine.
Past distortions of the medical ethos, such as Nazism and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, as well as more recent experience with
the ethical challenges of employer-based, market-driven managed care, provide important lessons as medicine contemplates the
future. Racial and ethnic disparities in health status and access to care serve as reminders that the racial doctrines that
fostered the horrors of the Holocaust and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study have not been removed completely from contemporary thinking.
Inequalities in health status based on race and ethnicity, as well as socioeconomic status, attest to the inescapable reality
of racism in America. When viewed against a background of historical distortions and disregard for the traditional tenets
of the medical ethos, persistent racial and ethnic disparities in health and the prospect of genetic engineering raise the
specter of discrimination because of genotype, a postmodern version of “racist medicine” or of a “new eugenics”. There is
a need to balance medicine’s devotion to the well-being of the patient and the primacy of the patient-physician relationship
against the need to meet the health care needs of society. The challenge facing the medical profession in the new millennium
is to establish an equilibrium between the responsibility to ensure quality health care for the individual patient while effecting
societal changes to achieve “health for all”.
Keywords Access to Care - Medical Ethos - Racism - Social Responsibility - Tuskegee