Volume 24, Number 2, 270-275, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0858-8

Published in partnership with the

Logo

Prevalence and Trends of Receipt of Cancer Screenings Among US Women with Diagnosed Diabetes

Guixiang Zhao, Earl S. Ford, Indu B. Ahluwalia, Chaoyang Li and Ali H. Mokdad

View Related Documents

Abstract

BACKGROUND  

Diabetes increases the risk of breast and colorectal cancers and has an undetermined relationship to cervical cancer. Improved screenings for these cancers are effective in reducing cancer mortality.

OBJECTIVES  

To examine the prevalence of receiving recommended screenings for these cancers and to assess the trends in the screening rates over time among US women with diagnosed diabetes in comparison with women without diabetes.

DESIGN  

Cross-sectional.

PARTICIPANTS  

A total of 63,650 to 182,168 adult women participated in the 1996−2006 (biennially) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

METHODS  

The prevalence of receiving cancer screenings was age-standardized to the 2000 US population. The adjusted prevalence and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression analyses. The linear trends in the screening rates were tested using orthogonal polynomial contrasts.

RESULTS  

In 2006, women with diabetes had a lower adjusted prevalence (74% versus 79%, P < 0.05) and the AOR (0.73, 95% CI: 0.66−0.81) for receiving cervical cancer screenings, but had a higher adjusted prevalence (63% versus 60%, P < 0.05) and the AOR (1.14, 95% CI: 1.04−1.24) for receiving colorectal cancer screenings compared to those without. In both women with diabetes and those without, the screening rate for colorectal cancer increased linearly during 2002−2006, whereas the screening rates for breast and cervical cancers changed little during 1996−2006.

CONCLUSION  

Women with diabetes were equally likely to be screened for breast cancer, less likely to be screened for cervical cancer, but more likely to be screened for colorectal cancer compared to those without. Overall, the screening rates in both groups remain below the recommended levels.

KEY WORDS  diabetes mellitus - mammogram - Papanicolaou test - fecal occult blood test - sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document