Volume 24, Number 1, 74-79, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0842-3

Published in partnership with the

Logo

Effect of Rater Training on Reliability and Accuracy of Mini-CEX Scores: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

David A. Cook, Denise M. Dupras, Thomas J. Beckman, Kris G. Thomas and V. Shane Pankratz

View Related Documents

Abstract

Background  

Mini-CEX scores assess resident competence. Rater training might improve mini-CEX score interrater reliability, but evidence is lacking.

Objective  

Evaluate a rater training workshop using interrater reliability and accuracy.

Design  

Randomized trial (immediate versus delayed workshop) and single-group pre/post study (randomized groups combined).

Setting  

Academic medical center.

Participants  

Fifty-two internal medicine clinic preceptors (31 randomized and 21 additional workshop attendees).

Intervention  

The workshop included rater error training, performance dimension training, behavioral observation training, and frame of reference training using lecture, video, and facilitated discussion. Delayed group received no intervention until after posttest.

Measurements  

Mini-CEX ratings at baseline (just before workshop for workshop group), and four weeks later using videotaped resident–patient encounters; mini-CEX ratings of live resident–patient encounters one year preceding and one year following the workshop; rater confidence using mini-CEX.

Results  

Among 31 randomized participants, interrater reliabilities in the delayed group (baseline intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.43, follow-up 0.53) and workshop group (baseline 0.40, follow-up 0.43) were not significantly different (p = 0.19). Mean ratings were similar at baseline (delayed 4.9 [95% confidence interval 4.6–5.2], workshop 4.8 [4.5–5.1]) and follow-up (delayed 5.4 [5.0–5.7], workshop 5.3 [5.0–5.6]; p = 0.88 for interaction). For the entire cohort, rater confidence (1 = not confident, 6 = very confident) improved from mean (SD) 3.8 (1.4) to 4.4 (1.0), p = 0.018. Interrater reliability for ratings of live encounters (entire cohort) was higher after the workshop (ICC 0.34) than before (ICC 0.18) but the standard error of measurement was similar for both periods.

Conclusions  

Rater training did not improve interrater reliability or accuracy of mini-CEX scores.

Clinical trials registration  

clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00667940

KEY WORDS  medical education - faculty development - rater training - clinical competence - assessment - randomized trial

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document