On the Distinction between Model-Theoretic and Generative-Enumerative Syntactic Frameworks
Geoffrey K. Pullum4
and Barbara C. Scholz5 
| (4) |
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA |
| (5) |
Department of Philosophy, San José State University, San José, California 95192, USA |
Abstract
Two kinds of framework for stating grammars of natural languages emerged during the 20th century. Here we call them generative-enumerative
syntax (GES)an d model-theoretic syntax (MTS). They are based on very different mathematics. GES developed in the 1950s out
of Post’s work on the syntactic side of logic. MTS arose somewhat later out of the semantic side of logic. We identify some
distinguishing theoretical features of these frameworks, relating to cardinality of the set of expressions, size of individual
expressions, and ‘transderivational constraints’. We then turn to three kinds of linguistic phenomena: partial grammaticality,
the syntactic properties of expression fragments, and the fact that the lexicon of any natural language is in constant flux,
and conclude that MTS has some major advantages for linguistic description that have been overlooked. We briefly consider
the issue of what natural languages in MTS terms, and touch on implications for parsing and acquisition.
Abstract Early versions of some of this material were presented to the Chicago Linguistic Society, the Ohio State University, and the
Australasian Association for Philosophy. We thank John Goldsmith, Lloyd Humberstone, Phokion Kolaitis, Paul Postal, Frank
Richter, Jim Rogers, Arnold Zwicky for advice, comments, and assistance. We particularly thank Patrick Davidson, Line Mikkelsen,
Glyn Morrill, Chris Potts, and Michael Wescoat for comments on the first draft of this paper. It should not, of course, be
assumed that any of these people agree with what we say here; some of them definitely do not.
References secured to subscribers.