Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
My Menu
Saved Items

Symposium: ABJS Carl T. Brighton Workshop on Health Policy Issues in Orthopaedic Surgery

Physician Collective Bargaining

Anthony Hunter Schiff1, 2, 3 Contact Information

(1)  1875 Century Park East, Suite 1600, Los Angeles, CA 90067, USA
(2)  UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
(3)  Schiff & Bernstein, APC, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Received: 18 December 2008  Accepted: 13 July 2009  Published online: 12 September 2009

Abstract  Current antitrust enforcement policy unduly restricts physician collaboration, especially among small physician practices. Among other matters, current enforcement policy has hindered the ability of physicians to implement efficient healthcare delivery innovations, such as the acquisition and implementation of health information technology (HIT). Furthermore, the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice have unevenly enforced the antitrust laws, thereby fostering an increasingly severe imbalance in the healthcare market in which dominant health insurers enjoy the benefit of largely unfettered consolidation at the cost of both consumers and providers. This article traces the history of antitrust enforcement in healthcare, describe the current marketplace, and suggest the problems that must be addressed to restore balance to the healthcare market and help to ensure an innovative and efficient healthcare system capable of meeting the demands of the 21st century. Specifically, the writer explains how innovative physician collaborations have been improperly stifled by the policies of the federal antitrust enforcement agencies, and recommend that these policies be relaxed to permit physicians more latitude to bargain collectively with health insurers in conjunction with procompetitive clinical integration efforts. The article also explains how the unbridled consolidation of the health insurance industry has resulted in higher premiums to consumers and lower compensation to physicians, and recommends that further consolidation be prohibited. Finally, the writer discusses how health insurers with market power are improperly undermining the physician-patient relationship, and recommend federal antitrust enforcement agencies take appropriate steps to protect patients and their physicians from this anticompetitive conduct. The article also suggests such steps will require changes in three areas: (1) health insurers must be prohibited from engaging in anticompetitive activity; (2) the continuing improper consolidation of the health insurance industry must be curtailed; and (3) the physician community must be permitted to undertake the collaborative activity necessary for the establishment of a transparent, coordinated, and efficient delivery system.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Contact Information Anthony Hunter Schiff
Email: tschiff@mdhealthlaw.com

References

1. Reiter v. Sontone Corps, 442 US 330 (1979) (quoting R. Bork, The Antitrust Paradox 66 [1978]).
 
2. NCAA v Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla, 468 US 85 107-09 (1984).
 
3. Weyerhaeuser v Ross – Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc, 549 US 312 (2007).
 
4. Goldfarb v. Va. State Bar, 421 U.S. 773, at p. 787 (1975).
 
5. Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 457 U.S. 332 (1982).
 
6. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, 441 U.S. 1 (1979).
 
7. US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, and Federal Trade Commission, Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in the Health Care Area (15 September 1993).
 
8. US Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care (Aug. 1996). Available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/1791.htm or www.ftc.gov/bc/healthcare/industryguide/policy/hlth3s.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
9. Letter from Jeffrey W. Brennan, Asst. Director, Bureau of Competition, to John J. Miles (Feb. 19, 2002).
 
10. Letter from Markus H. Meier to Christi J. Braun and John J. Miles (Sept. 17, 2007).
 
11. NCAA v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984).
 
12. Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations among Competitors (April 2000) (“Competitor Collaboration Guidelines”) at § 3.2.
 
13. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U. S. 533 (1944).
 
14. U.S. Dep’t of Justice & Federal Trade Comm’n, Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 0.1 (1992 rev. 1997, efficiencies section only) [hereinafter Merger Guidelines]. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/bc/docs/horizmer.htm. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
15. The Health Care Acquisition Report Fourteenth Edition, 2008. Norwalk, CT: Irving Levin Associates, Inc; 2008.
 
16. American Medical Association. Competition in Health Insurance: A Comprehensive Study of US Markets: 2008 Update. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/noindex/advocacy/9573.shtml. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
17. American Medical Association. Competition in Health Insurance: A Comprehensive Study of US Markets:/ 2007 Update. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/368/compstudy_52006.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
18. The Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research Educational Trust. Employer Health Benefits: 2008 Summary of Findings. Available at: http://ehbs.kff.org/. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
19. The Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research Educational Trust. Employer Health Benefits 2006 Summary of Findings. Available at: http://ehbs.kff.org/. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
20. Chernew M, Cutler D, Keenan P. Increasing health insurance costs and the decline in insurance coverage. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1021–1039.
PubMed CrossRef
 
21. Hammer PJ, Sage WM. Monopsony as an agency and regulatory problem in health care. Antitrust Law J. 2004;71:949–988.
 
22. Tu HT, Ginsburg PP. Losing ground: physician income, 1995–2005. Center for Studying Health System Change Tracking Report No. 15. 2006.
 
23. Robinson JC. Consolidation and the transformation of competition in health insurance. Health Aff. 2004;23:11–24.
CrossRef
 
24. United States v. Aetna, Revised Competitive Impact Statement, Civil Action 3-99CV1398-H (N.D.Tex, 1999). Available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f2600/2648.htm. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
25. United States v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., Case No. 1:05CV02436 (D.D.C. Dec. 20, 2005). Available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f213800/213815.htm. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
26. Association of American Medical Colleges. The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand: Projections Through 2025. Available at: https://services.aamc.org/Publications/showfile.cfm?file=version122.pdf&prd_id=244&prv_id=299&pdf_id=122. Accessed October 31, 2008.
 
27. Salsberg E, Grover A. Physician workforce shortages: implications and issues for academic health centers and policymakers. Acad Med. 2006;81:782–787.
PubMed CrossRef
 
28. Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC Statement on the Physician Workforce, June 2006. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/workforce/workforceposition.pdf. Accessed October 31, 2008.
 
29. Pham H, Ginsburg P. Unhealthy trends: the future of physician services, Health Aff. 2007;26:1586–1598.
CrossRef
 
30. Rosenthal M, Landon B, Howitt K, Song HR, Epstein AM. Climbing up the pay-for-performance learning curve: where are the early adopters now? Health Aff. 2007;26:1674–1682.
CrossRef
 
31. Rosenthal MB, Dudley RA. Pay-for-performance: will the latest payment trend improve care? JAMA. 2007;297:740–744.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
32. Easterbrook F. Maximum price fixing. 48 U. Chi. L. Rev. 886, 898–899 (1981).
 
33. Congressional Budget Office. Evidence on the costs and benefits of health information technology. May 2008:19–20.
 
34. Miller RH, West C, Brown TM, Sim I, Ganchoff C. The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. Health Aff. 2005;24:1127–1137.
CrossRef
 
35. Office of National Coordinator for Health Informational Technology (July 2007).
 
36. Trisolini M, Pope G, Kautter J, Aggarwal J. Medicare physician group practices: innovations in quality and efficiency. The Commonwealth Fund. 2006. Available at: www.commonwealthfund.org/usr_doc/971_Trisolini_Medicare_physician_group_practices_i.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2009.
 
37. American Medical Association. Physician Networks and Antitrust: A Call for a More Flexible Enforcement Policy. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/bc/healthcare/checkup/pdf/AMAComments.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2009
 
38. Campbell T. Bilateral Monopoly in Mergers, 74 Antitrust L.J. 521 (2007).
 


Export this article
Export this article as RIS | Text
 
Remote Address: 38.107.191.102 • Server: mpweb07
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)