Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Intuitive Humanoid Motion Generation Joining User-Defined Key-Frames and Automatic Learning
| |
|
Intuitive Humanoid Motion Generation Joining User-Defined Key-Frames and Automatic Learning
Marco Antonelli23, Fabio Dalla Libera23, Emanuele Menegatti23, Takashi Minato25 and Hiroshi Ishiguro24, 25
| (23) |
Intelligent Autonomous Systems Laboratory, Department of Information Engineering (DEI), Faculty of Engineering, University of Padua, Via Gradenigo 6/a, I-35131 Padova, Italy |
| (24) |
Department of Adaptive Machine Systems, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan |
| (25) |
ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan |
Abstract
In this paper we present a new method for generating humanoid robot movements. We propose to merge the intuitiveness of the
widely used key-frame technique with the optimization provided by automatic learning algorithms. Key-frame approaches are
straightforward but require the user to precisely define the position of each robot joint, a very time consuming task. Automatic
learning strategies can search for a good combination of parameters resulting in an effective motion of the robot without
requiring user effort. On the other hand their search usually cannot be easily driven by the operator and the results can
hardly be modified manually. While the fitness function gives a quantitative evaluation of the motion (e.g. ”How far the robot
moved?”), it cannot provide a qualitative evaluation, for instance the similarity to the human movements. In the proposed
technique the user, exploiting the key-frame approach, can intuitively bound the search by specifying relationships to be
maintained between the joints and by giving a range of possible values for easily understandable parameters. The automatic
learning algorithm then performs a local exploration of the parameter space inside the defined bounds. Thanks to the clear
meaning of the parameters provided by the user, s/he can give qualitative evaluation of the generated motion (e.g. ”This walking
gait looks odd. Let’s raise the knee more”) and easily introduce new constraints to the motion. Experimental results proved
the approach to be successful in terms of reduction of motion-development time, in terms of natural appearance of the motion,
and in terms of stability of the walking.
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|