Feminist activists frequently complain about the failure of most women today—even women of independence and accomplishment—to
identify themselves as feminists. Advocates of women's studies usually explain away this uncomfortable fact by calling it
“backlash” or blaming it on women's false consciousness or adherence to “privilege.” In this essay I offer an alternative
explanation for women's public indifference or outright hostility to feminism, arguing that it is a result of the rhetoric
and positions adopted by feminists themselves, especially those working in academic women's studies. I draw on recent books
and articles reflecting on women's studies, feminist pedagogy, and feminism in general; publications of feminist organizations
such as the NWSA and the AAUW; the Women's Studies E-Mail List (WMST-L); women's studies programs' own mission statements
and course descriptions; and comments addressed to me personally by women's studies' supporters as well as critics. In drawing
coclusions from my reading of these materials, I attempt to gauge the status of women's studies as an academic and/or a political
endeavor around the year 2000.
Daphne Patai teaches at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Among her books are The Orwell Mystique: A Study in Male Ideology; Brazilian Women Speak: Contemporary Life Stories; and Heterophobia: Sexual Harassment and the Future of Feminism. She is also the author (with Noretta Koertge) of Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies (revised edition forthcoming, 2002).