| Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research |
| © The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2008 |
| 10.1007/s11999-008-0518-7 |
| (1) | Bologna, Italy |
![]() |
Alessandro Codivilla Email: dick.brand@clinorthop.org |
Received: 19 August 2008 Accepted: 28 August 2008 Published online: 27 September 2008
The difficulties to be encountered in lengthening a shortened limb, are found, in operation, to be greater as regards the fleshy parts, than as regards the bones. It is comparatively easy to remove the splinters of a fractured bone which is wrongly consolidated; to separate a curved bone; or to perform an oblique osteotomy, but a decided limit is arrived at in the correction of a displacement, or in the lengthening of the bones, by reason of the contraction, or resistance, of the muscles. Our supreme consideration must therefore be given in striving to overcome this resistance on the part of the muscles, without however damaging in any way the action of the tissues. This is the special subject on which I desire to enlarge, as it appears to me that this important part in the cure of deformity of the limbs, has never been sufficiently taken into consideration.
As things stand at present, we trust to empiric measures to overcome this contraction of the muscles, whereas in reality mathematical precision should be used, in each special case.
But for this mathematical precision, we are still in want of a scientific basis. We are in fact, without the requisite knowledge as to how the normal muscles and other tissues act, when subjected to forced distention; as to how great an extent they are capable of being lengthened, without their physiologic action being altered; as to the method, in lengthening, which may be best adapted to them; as to the action, while subjected to distention of those tissues which have become shortened through the separation of the bone which kept them in place; as to their loss in elasticity, when time has elapsed since their shortening, and as to many other questions, which I omit, for the sake of brevity.
Even admitting that we possessed the knowledge which at present we have not, practically, we could not solve the problem with mathematical accuracy, on account of the many intricacies which surround it, but we might at any rate arrive at some conclusion, which would serve to guide us, and help us to emerge from the darkness and uncertainty in which we at present are.
Then again there is a great limitation in the degree of tensive force which may be applied to a limb, by reason of the inability, on the part of the patient, to bear, beyond a certain limit, the pain proceeding from the drawn or compressed skin. This has not even been taken into consideration in determining what force is necessary for the extension of the tissues, to their maximum length, while compatible with the maintenance of their normal functions, which constitutes the rational limit to the intensity of the force which may be applied. Now in order that we may be enabled to proceed, in an ideal way, toward the desired extension of the fleshy parts, it is necessary to remove all the causes, which, without justification, limit, or waste, the force, physiologically possible to be applied.
I am of the opinion that an important step in this direction has been gained by my method of applying the force directly to the skeleton.
Before however speaking of this, I must mention that by experience gained through modern methods in the cure of deformity—especially of congenital dislocation of the hip—I am convinced that in so far as regards the extension of the fleshy parts, and when great force is necessary, the best results are obtained from forced lengthening, practised under narcotics; by using a sudden and intense force; and by then applying the plaster apparatus to the limb while it is still maintained in complete extension.
I therefore hold that preference should be given to this method.
But in cases of great shortening, or where the resistance is conspicuous, I believe it would be dangerous to actually operate with a tension which is extraordinarily great, in order to obtain an immediate lengthening of the tissues, sufficient to remedy the shortness of the limb.
In these cases, therefore, instead of applying a too powerful traction, it is better to proceed to the act of lengthening by stages, followed by the application of a traction of medium intensity (not exceeding 25 or 30 kilograms). This mode of extension by stages, removes the inconveniences which arise from excessive traction, and enables us to overcome the resistance, by means of a proportionately lesser force; because in its every fresh application there is a decided gain in the extension of the fleshy parts, to which the elasticity of the tissues in a certain way is adapted. The following was first the method of technical application:
Having, if necessary, performed the osteotomy, and removed the splinters, etc., and in a word executed the operation which removes the resistance offered by the bones to the process of extension, the patient was placed on a Schede-Eschbaum bed, and the limb was subjected to traction, and to counter-traction. The force adopted ranged from 25 to 75 kilograms.
The traction was thus applied above the plaster apparatus which covered the foot, whilst the plastering, without interrupting the traction, was completed in that part which had to enclose the rest of the limb, and the pelvis. When the apparatus was solidified, the traction was withdrawn, and the force continued to act upon the limb by means of the detracting action of the said apparatus.
After a few days’ time a new detracting force was applied, in the following manner:
The plaster apparatus was cut circularly, by means of a saw (filo sego di Gigli), so as to correspond with the division of the bone, and the traction and counter-traction were directly applied, respectively to both the nearest and the farthest portions of the plaster apparatus. These were thus separated the one from the other, and the limb was lengthened correspondingly.
With this fresh application of the traction, the soft parts underwent a further lengthening, and in the same manner in which the first application of the force had been made, the detracting action was left to the apparatus, so soon as this had been completed. Thus the space left empty by the separation of the two parts, was filled up by a few windings of the bandage round the limb.
The application of the force could then be repeated as many times as was considered necessary, either under narcotics, or without, according to the needs of the case.
But the method of application in this manner, which I applied in my first cases, gives rise to inconveniences.
I have already spoken of the general derangement of the nervous system, which followed, when the traction had been very intense (50 to 75 kilograms).
But there was another complication which it was impossible to remedy, without modifying the technic of the method. This was that the compression used upon the instep, upon the ankle, and upon the heel, led to necrosis of a large surface of the skin, and of the tissues (including the tendons), which lie between it and the bones.
These places are those in fact, upon which the force acts with the greatest intensity, because the lengthening of the limb is maintained by the resistance which the apparatus offers to the foot, which has a tendency to draw up, under the tensive action of the soft parts.
This applies so far, to the traction. The counter-traction on the other hand when applied to the base of the limb, has at its disposition a larger surface to rest on, and upon those parts of the bones which are (with the exception of the ischion), very well protected by the covering formed by the fleshy parts. And for these reasons the pressure exercised by the apparatus upon the base of the limb is without the grave consequences it has, when applied to the foot.
I have obtained this direct transmission of the force to the skeleton, by means of a large nail being passed through the back part of the heel; a nail, which by means of two lateral ferrules, fixed in the plaster apparatus, is held in the desired position.
The diagram shows better than any description can do, the position of the nail with regard to the skeleton, and to the apparatus.
Experience has demonstrated that the traction transmitted to the skeleton by means of the nail passing through the heel, does not present any inconveniences, and fulfils the desired effect. There have been a great many cases in which both by me, and by others, this method of traction has been put to the proof.
By reason of the position which it occupies between the longitudinal axis of the tibia, and that of the tricipite surale, it maintains the foot in an intermediary state between flexion and extension, and does not in any way injure its function.
The method thus modified, renders possible a far stronger application of the traction, than has ever yet been obtained, and permits the lengthening of the fleshy parts of a shortened limb, without its giving us any anxiety and without other limitation in the application of the force, save only for the harm which it might cause to the physiologic functions of the tissues to be lengthened.
By this method we have obtained in all cases the constant fulfilment of our desires, viz.: the important lengthening of from 3 to 8 cm., which, I believe I can well affirm, could not have been arrived at by other means.
I mention some cases which I have cured by the foregoing means and show some radiographs and photographs.
In these cases no new applications of the distensive force were continued.
The method has borne the very best results, correcting the deformity, and diminishing, or completely removing the shortness of the limb. In cases of fracture of the femur, or in oblique osteotomy, the lengthening of the limbs has varied from 3 to 8 cm. After the traction on the nail has been accomplished the method has left no ill effects of any kind.
| 1 | See Archirio di Ortopedia, fascicolo 3°, 1904. |