Institutional Login
Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please
log in
or
register
.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can
help
.
My Menu
Marked Items
Alerts
Order History
Saved Items
All
Favorites
Content Types
All
Publications
Journals
Book Series
Books
Reference Works
Protocols
Subject Collections
Architecture and Design
Behavioral Science
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Business and Economics
Chemistry and Materials Science
Computer Science
Earth and Environmental Science
Engineering
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
Mathematics and Statistics
Medicine
Physics and Astronomy
Professional and Applied Computing
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
English
Deutsch
한국어
日本語
Français
Español
العربية
Русский
Book Chapter
Lessons Learned from Applying the Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide for Process Improvement
Book Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
ISSN
0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online)
Volume
Volume 2349/2002
Book
Software Quality — ECSQ 2002
DOI
10.1007/3-540-47984-8
Copyright
2002
ISBN
978-3-540-43749-9
DOI
10.1007/3-540-47984-8_11
Pages
73-81
Subject Collection
Computer Science
SpringerLink Date
Tuesday, January 01, 2002
Add to marked items
Add to shopping cart
Add to saved items
Permissions & Reprints
Recommend this chapter
PDF (158.8 KB)
Free Preview
Lessons Learned from Applying the Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide for Process Improvement
Marjo Kauppinen
6
, Tapani Aaltio
6
and Sari Kujala
6
(6)
Software Business and Engineering Institute, Helsinki University of Technology, P.O. Box 9600, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland
Abstract
The systematic definition and management of requirements is becoming increasingly important in product development. Many software organizations are interested in improving their requirements engineering processes but they do not know where to begin. Sommerville et al. have developed a framework known as the Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide (REGPG) for incremental process improvement. We applied the REGPG in four Finnish organizations and evaluated its strengths and weaknesses. The most important strengths of the REGPG are that it raises personnel awareness of requirements engineering and it includes relevant requirements practices allowing organizations to select practical improvement actions. The main weakness of the REGPG is that it offers a very limited set of general process improvement guidelines. Therefore, organizations that want to develop their requirements engineering processes systematically need to support the use of the REGPG with other improvement frameworks.
Marjo
Kauppinen
Email:
marjo.kauppinen@hut.fi
Tapani
Aaltio
Email:
tapani.aaltio@hut.fi
Sari
Kujala
Email:
sari.kujala@hut.fi
Fulltext Preview (Small,
Large
)
References secured to subscribers.
more options
Find
Query Builder
Close
|
Clear
Title (ti)
Summary (su)
Author (au)
ISSN (issn)
ISBN (isbn)
DOI (doi)
And
Or
Not
(
)
* (wildcard)
"" (exact)
Within all content
Within this book series
Within this book
Export this chapter
Export this chapter as
RIS
|
Text
Frequently asked questions
|
General information on journals and books
|
Send us your feedback
|
Impressum
|
Contact
© Springer.
Part of Springer Science+Business Media
Privacy, Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions, © Copyright Information
MetaPress Privacy Policy
Remote Address: 38.107.191.106 • Server: mpweb04
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)