Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
What Gets Measured Gets Done: Assessing Data Availability for Adolescent Populations
| |
|
Original Paper
What Gets Measured Gets Done: Assessing Data Availability for Adolescent Populations
David K. Knopf1, 2 , M. Jane Park1, Claire D. Brindis1, 3, Tina Paul Mulye1 and Charles E. Irwin Jr.1
| (1) |
National Adolescent Health Information Center, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, 3333 California Street, Suite 245, San Francisco, California 94118, USA |
| (2) |
Pediatric Social Work Department, UCSF Children’s Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, USA |
| (3) |
Institute of Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA |
Received: 8 March 2006 Accepted: 30 January 2007 Published online: 17 February 2007
Abstract
Objectives: To identify specific adolescent sub-populations; to evaluate the health data available regarding these populations related
to 21 key national adolescent health objectives from Healthy People 2010; and to make recommendations for improving data capacity to further efforts to reduce health disparities among adolescents.
Methods: Adolescent populations were identified through a consensus process. Academic and government literature was extensively reviewed
using internet search techniques to identify available national data for each of these populations on each key national health
objective.
Results: 18 adolescent subpopulations were identified. These populations fit into four overlapping categories defined by demography,
legal status, chronic health condition, or other special characteristics. Overall, national, population-based data regarding
these sub-populations were located for 36% of the 21 health objectives. Within the sub-populations, most data was available
for ethnic/racial groups, with 57–81% of each of the objectives having data. Data regarding rural/urban groups were found
for about one-half of the 21 objectives, and data were located on all other groups for one-fourth or fewer of the objectives.
Within the objectives, substance abuse objectives were the most widely measured, with data available for 56–78% of the various
populations. For some objectives, such as drug-or alcohol-related motor vehicle deaths depression among the developmentally
disabled, no national data were found.
Conclusions: There are still too little data available regarding the specific health status or health objectives for different adolescent
populations. A national adolescent data-priority agenda is needed to develop strategies to improve health data regarding adolescent
sub-populations. Federal and state health monitoring agencies could create national health profiles of different populations,
include more population markers in health studies, and develop tools for population-specific health assessment, particularly
for those within the government’s care, including incarcerated and foster care youth.
Keywords Adolescent - Data - Critical objectives - Health disparities - Minorities - National health objectives
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|