Volume 49, Number 7, 1522-1527, DOI: 10.1007/s00125-006-0276-6

Published in partnership with the

Logo

European Association for the Study of Diabetes

Is grand multiparity associated with an increased risk of dysglycaemia?

D. Simmons, J. Shaw, A. McKenzie, S. Eaton, A. J. Cameron and P. Zimmet

View Related Documents

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis  

We sought to determine the risk of diabetes and IGT/IFG with grand multiparity.

Subjects, materials and methods  

Women, aged ≥25 years, from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study and the Crossroads Undiagnosed Disease Study (a rural study in Victoria, Australia), participated in a household census (response 67 and 70%, respectively), subsequently attending a biomedical examination that included an oral glucose tolerance test (58% [6198] and 69% [819]).

Results  

After adjusting for age, obesity and socio-economic status, diabetes, but not IGT/IFG, was less common among women with a parity of 1 to 2 (odds ratio [OR]=0.64 [0.48–0.84]) and 3 to 4 (OR=0.72 [0.53–0.96]) than in grand multiparous women. This relationship was unrelated to past hysterectomy, use of the oral contraceptive pill or menopausal status.

Conclusions/interpretation  

Grand multiparity is associated with an increased risk of diabetes but not of IGT/IFG. We postulate that parity accelerates transition from IGT/IFG to diabetes, more than it does transition from normal glucose tolerance to IGT/IFG.

Keywords  Diabetes - Hysterectomy - Menopause - Oral contraceptive pill - Parity

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document