We examined the influence of sex divergences in reproductive role and physiology on catchability and demographic patterns
in a closed population of aspic viper (
Vipera aspis Linné). During 8 years, there were 4800 captures of 988 adults. In both sexes, captures were more frequent in spring when
climatic conditions and reproductive activities impose extended basking periods that make animals more detectable. On average,
males were captured more than females, reflecting intense sexual activity (i.e., mate searching) in spring. Reproductive females
were more catchable than nonreproductive females, illustrating a major increase in basking behavior associated with reproduction.
Estimates of population size revealed a sexually dimorphic demographic system with marked year-to-year fluctuations in females
contrasting with a more stable male population. This sex difference in population dynamic reflects sex divergences in the
acquisition and allocation of energy for reproduction. In both sexes, reproduction is fueled by body reserves. Females, however,
need to accumulate substantial body reserves to reach a high body condition threshold before reproduction, whereas the male
pattern of energy allocation is more gradual (i.e., no fixed threshold). In addition, reproduction entails major survival
cost in females (i.e., most females reproduce just once), whereas males are generally annual breeders. As a consequence of
this sex divergence, food abundance, through its direct effect on body store dynamics, influenced major demographic parameters
of females (e.g., proportion of reproducing individuals, annual changes in population size) but not males.
Key words Catchability - Population size - Capital breeding - Snake
Received: January 7, 2002 / Accepted: August 10, 2002
Acknowledgments We thank Gwénael Beauplet, Hervé Fritz, and Emily Taylor for comments on the manuscript. Financial support was provided by
the Conseil Régional de Poitou-Charentes, Conseil Général des Deux-Sèvres, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (France).
Thanks to Melle for enthralling debates on multiple regression analysis. Finally, Jean De Riboulin, who solved many technical
problems.
Correspondence to:O. Lourdais