Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
My Menu
Saved Items

Symposium: Selected Papers Presented at the 2008 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society

Biopsy of Soft Tissue Masses: Evidence-based Medicine for the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society

Bruce T. RougraffContact Information, Albert Aboulafia2, J. Sybil Biermann3 and John Healey4

(1)  Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital, 8450 Northwest Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46278, USA
(2)  Sinai Hospital Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
(3)  University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
(4)  Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Received: 3 March 2009  Accepted: 17 June 2009  Published online: 14 July 2009

Abstract  The literature contains a number of controversies regarding key questions: (1) When is a biopsy indicated? (2) How should the biopsy be placed? (3) How should the biopsy be performed and which has the greatest diagnostic accuracy? (4) Who should perform the biopsy? (5) What clinical parameters present the greatest diagnostic difficulty? Using PubMed and Google Scholar we performed English-language literature searches of clinical studies reporting biopsy of soft tissue masses. Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria but were only able to address three of the five questions the authors had hoped to evaluate. Available evidence suggests open biopsy has the highest diagnostic accuracy over core needle biopsy, which was higher than fine needle aspiration. There was no evidence to address who is best suited to perform the biopsy (general surgeon, orthopaedic surgeon, radiologist, pathologist) in terms of accuracy of diagnosis. Frozen section at the time of biopsy may improve diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic difficulty was associated with myxoid and round cell neoplasms, infections, and tumors located in the paraspinal region. The limited number of references addressing these issues demonstrated the need for more Level I research in the area of biopsy of soft tissue masses.
Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
This work was performed at Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital, Indianapolis, IN.

Contact Information Bruce T. Rougraff
Email: brougraff@aol.com

References

1. Altuntas AO, Slavin J, Smith PJ, Schlict SM, Powell GJ, Ngan S, Toner G, Choong PF. Accuracy of computed tomography guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:187–191.
PubMed CrossRef
 
2. Ball AB, Fisher C, Pittam M, Watkins RM, Westbury G. Diagnosis of soft tissue tumors by Tru-Cut biopsy. Br J Surg. 1990;77:756–758.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
3. Barth RJ Jr, Merino MJ, Solomon D, Yang YC, Baker AR. A prospective study of the value of core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of soft tissue masses. Surgery. 1992;112:536–543.
PubMed
 
4. Barton MB, Miller T, Wolff T, Petitti D, LeFevre M, Sawaya G, Yawn B, Guirguis-Blake J, Calonge N, Harris R; US Preventive Services Task Force. How to read the new recommendation statement: methods update from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:123–127.
PubMed
 
5. Carrino JA, Khurana B, Ready JE, Silverman SG, Winalski CS. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2179–2187.
PubMed CrossRef
 
6. Costa MJ, Campman SC, Davis RL, Howell LP. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sarcoma. Retrospective review of diagnostic utility and specificity. Diagn Cytopathol. 1996;15:23–32.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
7. Das K, Hameed M, Heller D, Mirani N, Doty N, Benevenia J, Patterson F, Aisner S. Liquid-based vs conventional smears in fine needle aspiration of bone and soft tissue tumors. Acta Cytol. 2003;47:197–201.
PubMed
 
8. Domanski HA, Akerman M, Carlen B. Core-needle biopsy performed by the cytopathologist: a complement to FNA of soft tissue and bone lesions. Cancer. 2005;105:229–239.
PubMed CrossRef
 
9. Dupuy DE, Rosenberg AE, Punyaratabadhu T, Tan MH, Mankin HJ. Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:759–762.
PubMed ChemPort
 
10. Hau A, Kim I, Kattapuram S, Hornicek FJ, Rosenberg AE, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Accuracy of CT-guided biopsies in 359 patients with musculoskeletal lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31:349–353.
PubMed SpringerLink
 
11. Hodge JC. Percutaneous biopsy of the musculoskeletal system: a review of 77 cases. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1999;50:121–125.
PubMed ChemPort
 
12. Hoeber I, Spillane AJ, Fisher C, Thomas JM. Accuracy of biopsy techniques for limb and limb girdle soft tissue tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:80–87.
PubMed SpringerLink ChemPort
 
13. Issakov J, Flusser G, Kollender Y, Merimsky O, Lifschitz-Mercer B, Meller I. Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for bone and soft tissue tumors. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003;5:28–30.
PubMed
 
14. Kissin MW, Fisher C, Carter RL, Horton LW, Westbury G. Value of Tru-Cut biopsy in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Br J Surg. 1986;73:742–744.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
15. Madhavan VP, Smile SR, Chandra SS, Ratnakar C. Value of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2002;45:165–168.
PubMed ChemPort
 
16. Maitra A, Ashfaq R, Saboorian MH, Lindberg G, Gokaslan ST. The role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the primary diagnosis of mesenchymal lesions: a community hospital-based experience. Cancer. 2000;90:178–185.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
17. Mitsuyoshi G, Naito N, Kawai A, Kunisada T, Yoshida A, Yanai H, Dendo S, Yoshino T, Kanazawa S, Ozaki T. Accurate diagnosis of musculoskeletal lesions by core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94:21–27.
PubMed CrossRef
 
18. Moore TM, Meyers MH, Patzakis MJ, Terry R, Harvey JP Jr. Closed biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:375–380.
PubMed ChemPort
 
19. Moulton JS, Blebea JS, Dunco DM, Braley SE, Bisset GS 3rd, Emery KH. MR imaging of soft-tissue masses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1191–1199.
PubMed ChemPort
 
20. Nagira K, Yamamoto T, Akisue T, Marui T, Hitora T, Nakatani T, Kurosaka M, Ohbayashi C. Reliability of FNA biopsy in the initial diagnosis of soft tissue lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;27:354–361.
PubMed CrossRef
 
21. Ogilvie CM, Torbert JT, Finstein JL, Fox EJ, Lackman RD. Clinical utility of percutaneous biopsies of musculoskeletal tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:95–100.
PubMed CrossRef
 
22. Parkkola RK, Mattila KT, Heikkila JT, Ekfors TO, Komu ME, Vaara T, Aro HT. MR-guided core biopsies of soft tissue tumors on an open 0.23 T imager. Acta Radiol. 2001;42:302–305.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
23. Puri A, Shingade VU, Agarwal MG, Anchan C, Juvekar S, Desai S, Jambhekar NA. CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in deep seated musculoskeletal lesions: a prospective study of 128 cases. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:138–143.
PubMed SpringerLink ChemPort
 
24. Ray-Coquard I, Ranchère-Vince D, Thiesse P, Ghesquières H, Biron P, Sunyach MP, Rivoire M, Lancry L, Méeus P, Sebban C, Blay JY. Evaluation of core needle biopsy as a substitute to open biopsy in the diagnosis of soft-tissue masses. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:2021–2025.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
25. Rydholm A, Akerman M, Idvall I, Persson BM. Aspiration cytology of soft tissue tumors. A prospective study of its influence on choice of surgical procedure. Int Orthop. 1982;6:209–214.
PubMed ChemPort
 
26. Serpell JW, Pitcher ME. Pre-operative core biopsy of soft-tissue tumors facilitates their surgical management. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68:345–349.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
27. Skrzynski MC, Biermann JS, Montag A, Simon MA. Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:644–649.
PubMed ChemPort
 
28. Smith TJ, Safail H, Foster EA, Reinhold RB. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Surg. 1985;149:540–545.
PubMed CrossRef ChemPort
 
29. Soudack M, Nachtigal A, Vladovski E, Brook O, Gaitini D. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle biopsy of soft tissue masses with histopathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1271–1277.
PubMed
 
30. Torriani M, Etchebehere M, Amstalden E. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of bone and soft tissue tumors. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:275–281.
PubMed
 
31. Wakely PE, Kneisl JS. Soft tissue aspiration cytopathology. Diagnostic accuracy and limitations. Cancer. 2000;90:292–298.
PubMed CrossRef
 
32. Yang YJ, Damron TA. Comparison of needle core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:759–764.
PubMed
 
33. Yeow KM, Tan CF, Chen JS, Hsueh C. Diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy in soft tissue masses about superficial bone lesions. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19:849–855.
PubMed ChemPort
 


Export this article
Export this article as RIS | Text
 
Remote Address: 38.107.191.100 • Server: mpweb15
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)