Volume 42, Number 5, 620-625, DOI: 10.1007/BF02234139

Pelvic reservoir with S-pouch
Can surgeons evaluate the results of their own operations?

Tryggve Ljung, Ulla Monsén, Rolf Hultcrantz, Lennart Iselius, Torgny Svenberg and Bertil Poppen

View Related Documents

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate whether operating surgeons could follow up the functional outcome of their own operations, without bias, by using standardized methods at follow-up. METHODS: Fifty-five patients who received a pelvic reservoir with an S-pouch were evaluated regarding functional outcome after at least one year post-operative follow-up. The functional surgical outcome was evaluated by an internist especially trained in gastroenterology and the operating surgeon by using a standardized scale comprising eight functional variables. RESULTS: None of the variables analyzed reached statistically significant difference between the two observers, and a high degree of agreement could be shown by using kappa and weighted kappa analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that it is possible for an operating surgeon to assess the postoperative surgical outcome using standardized methods at follow-up.

Key words  Functional outcome - Interobserver variations - Pelvic reservoir - Ulcerative colitis

Supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council Grant 9127, The Karolinska Institute Fund, and The Ruth and Richard Julin Fund.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document