Background
Fluid management during liposuction appears to as much an art as it is a science. Because of different infiltration practices
such as wet, superwet, and tumescent techniques, different fluid management guidelines are required. This has assumed greater
significance as surgeons have undertaken aspirations with larger volumes (≥4 l) and the potential complications of hypovolemia
and fluid overload have materialized.
Methods
In this prospective study, 580 consecutive patients underwent liposuction using an average infiltrate-to-total aspirate ratio
of 0.38. For all the patients, noninvasive hemodynamic parameters were assessed to evaluate a clinically based guideline for
fluid management in liposuction.
Results
The average infiltrate-to-total aspirate ratio was 0.38 ± 0.18 (range, 0.24–0.8). Total urine output was 1.63 ml/kg per hour
(range, 1.06–3.4 ml/kg/h). The average postoperative heart rate was 92.16 beats/min, and the average postoperative mean blood
pressure readings were 70.41 mmHg. The intraoperative fluid ratio, defined as the ratio of intraoperative intravenous fluid
plus subcutaneous infiltrate to total aspirate, ranged from 0.98 to 2.1 (average, 1.25). The average percentage of body weight
aspirated was 5.2% (range, 1.76–7.02%)
Conclusion
This article presents a safe fluid management guideline based on experimental data from 580 patients who underwent liposuction
using average infiltration-to-aspirate rates of 0.38. However, the calculated volumes from all the formulas should be viewed
as educated guesses of the appropriate fluid load, and clinical judgment is essential.
Keywords Fluid management - Fluid overload - Fluid resuscitation - Hypovolemia - Liposuction