Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Segmental Resection and Replantation Have a Role for Selected Advanced Sarcomas in the Upper Limb
| |
|
Original Article
Segmental Resection and Replantation Have a Role for Selected Advanced Sarcomas in the Upper Limb
Soo Bong Hahn1, Yun Rak Choi1 , Ho Jung Kang1 and Kyoo Ho Shin1
| (1) |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea |
Received: 24 September 2008 Accepted: 17 April 2009 Published online: 2 May 2009
Abstract Although limb salvage surgery for primary sarcoma of the upper limb is a standard procedure, it often is technically challenging.
We asked whether segmental resection and replantation would provide (1) local control and long-term survival and (2) useful
limb function in patients who had advanced primary malignant and aggressive tumors of the upper limbs. We retrospectively
reviewed six patients treated with this procedure when a wide resection around the tumor could not be achieved with other
limb-salvage procedures. Diagnoses included osteosarcoma (two), Ewing’s sarcoma (one), leiomyosarcoma (one), and giant cell
tumor (two). Four patients had displaced pathologic fractures. Minimum followup was 40 months (mean, 164 months; range, 40–214 months).
All but one patient remained disease-free; the patient with Ewing’s sarcoma died from the disease 40 months after surgery.
The average functional score at last followup was 20 points. The mean grasping and pinching power of the operative hand were
66% and 72% of the contralateral side, respectively. Two patients had complications: one had wound dehiscence that subsequently
healed and one had radial nerve palsy that recovered spontaneously by 3 months. Segmental resection and replantation may have
a role in selected cases for treatment of advanced primary sarcoma or aggressive giant cell tumor of the upper limb as partial
limb salvage.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
The authors have no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, parent/licensing arrangements,
etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations
were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study
was obtained.
References
| 1. |
Athanasian EA, Healey JH. Resection replantation of the arm for sarcoma: an alternative to amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;395:204–208.
|
| |
| 2. |
Athwal GS, Chin PY, Adams RA, Morrey BF. Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty for tumours of the distal humerus and elbow.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1369–1374.
|
| |
| 3. |
Black AW, Szabo RM, Titelman RM. Treatment of malignant tumors of the proximal humerus with allograft-prosthesis composite
reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:525–533.
|
| |
| 4. |
Campanacci M, Giunti A, Olmi R. [Metaphyseal and diaphyseal localization of giant cell tumors] [in Italian]. Chir Organi Mov. 1975;62:29–34.
|
| |
| 5. |
El-Gammal TA, El-Sayed A, Kotb MM. Resection replantation of the upper limb for aggressive malignant tumors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122:173–176.
|
| |
| 6. |
Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures
after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246.
|
| |
| 7. |
Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:106–120.
|
| |
| 8. |
Gebhardt MC, Roth YF, Mankin HJ. Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction in the proximal part of the humerus after excision
of a musculoskeletal tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:334–345.
|
| |
| 9. |
Getty PJ, Peabody TD. Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intra-articular
resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1138–1146.
|
| |
| 10. |
Ghert MA, Abudu A, Driver N, Davis AM, Griffin AM, Pearce D, White L, O’Sullivan B, Catton CN, Bell RS, Wunder JS. The indications
for and the prognostic significance of amputation as the primary surgical procedure for localized soft tissue sarcoma of the
extremity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:10–17.
|
| |
| 11. |
Hahn SB, Kim NH, Choi NH. Treatment of bone tumors around the shoulder joint by the Tikhoff-Linberg procedure. Yonsei Med J. 1990;31:110–122.
|
| |
| 12. |
Hahn SB, Park HJ, Kim HS, Kim SH, Shin KH. Surgical treatment of malignant and aggressive bone tumors around the knee by segmental
resection and rotationplasty. Yonsei Med J. 2003;44:485–492.
|
| |
| 13. |
Hanna SA, David LA, Aston WJ, Gikas PD, Blunn GW, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus following
resection of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1498–1503.
|
| |
| 14. |
Ilizarov S, Blyakher A, Rozbruch SR. Lengthening of a free fibular graft after sarcoma resection of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:242–246.
|
| |
| 15. |
Kawaguchi N, Matumoto S, Manabe J. New method of evaluating the surgical margin and safety margin for musculoskeletal sarcoma,
analysed on the basis of 457 surgical cases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1995;121:555–563.
|
| |
| 16. |
Kulkarni A, Fiorenza F, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. The results of endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the distal
humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:240–243.
|
| |
| 17. |
Kumar D, Grimer RJ, Abudu A, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus: long-term results.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:717–722.
|
| |
| 18. |
Mann GN. Less is (usually) more: when is amputation appropriate for treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:1–2.
|
| |
| 19. |
Murray PM. Free vascularized bone transfer in limb salvage surgery of the upper extremity. Hand Clin. 2004;20:vi, 203–211.
|
| |
| 20. |
Shin KH, Park HJ, Yoo JH, Hahn SB. Reconstructive surgery in primary malignant and aggressive benign bone tumor of the proximal
humerus. Yonsei Med J. 2000;41:304–311.
|
| |
| 21. |
Tamurian RM, Gutow AP. Amputations of the hand and upper extremity in the management of malignant tumors. Hand Clin. 2004;20:vi, 213–220.
|
| |
| 22. |
Windhager R, Millesi H, Kotz R. Resection-replantation for primary malignant tumours of the arm: an alternative to fore-quarter
amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:176–184.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|