Published in partnership with the

Logo

Club Jules Gonin

Infracyanine-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole repair: Does it make a difference?

Kelvin Rivett, Louis Kruger and Sarah Radloff

View Related Documents

Abstract

Purpose  

To investigate whether Infracyanine-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in macular hole repair affects the anatomical and functional outcome and complication rate.

Methods  

A retrospective analysis of 139 consecutive cases of stage 2 and stage 3 macular hole repairs with or without Infracyanine-assisted ILM peeling.

Results  

There were 67 eyes with Infracyanine staining of the ILM and 72 eyes in the non-ILM-stained group. The results are analyzed functionally, anatomically and in terms of complications. A similar anatomical and functional closure rate was obtained with one unclosed macular hole in the stained group and two in the non-stained group (P=1.0). Fifty-two percent of the eyes in the stained group and 59% of those in the non-stained group achieved 0.5 vision or better (P=0.40). The mean postoperative vision was 0.55 in the stained group and 0.54 in the non-stained group (P=0.65). The mean improvement in vision was 0.40 in the stained group and 0.36 in the non-stained group (P=0.21).

Conclusion  

Anatomical and functional results are similar with or without Infracyanine-assisted ILM peeling. There was no apparent adverse effect of Infracyanine use on visual function, and no apparent retinal toxicity was found.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document