Volume 38, Number 6, 635-644, DOI: 10.1007/s00247-007-0728-2

Published in partnership with

Logo

ESPR, SPR, AOSPR and SLARP

CT versus plain radiographs for evaluation of c-spine injury in young children: do benefits outweigh risks?

Ricardo R. Jimenez, Michael A. DeGuzman, Shelly Shiran, Andrew Karrellas and Robert L. Lorenzo

View Related Documents

Abstract

Background  

Various reports support the use of cervical spine (c-spine) CT over conventional radiography in screening of c-spine injury. Interest now exists in diagnostic radiation-induced morbidity.

Objective  

To estimate excess relative risk for developing cancer from c-spine high-resolution CT radiation exposure.

Materials and methods  

We conducted a retrospective review of children evaluated for c-spine injury using CT. The study population was divided into three age groups, 0–4 years (group 1), 5–8 years (group 2), and older than 8 years (group 3). Anthropomorphic 1-year-old and 5-year-old phantoms were used to measure radiation at the thyroid during radiography and CT. Excess relative risk for thyroid cancer was estimated using these measurements.

Results  

A total of 557 patients were evaluated with CT. The radiographic method most commonly used was head CT/c-spine CT in 363 (65%). Only 179 children (32%) had any type of prior radiography. The use of c-spine CT exposes the thyroid to 90–200 times more radiation than multiple conventional radiographs. The mean excess relative risk for thyroid cancer after CT was 2.0 for group 1 and 0.6 for group 2. There were no comparison data for group 3.

Conclusion  

C-spine CT is associated with a significant exposure to ionizing radiation and increases excess relative risk for thyroid cancer in young children.

Keywords  High-resolution CT - Excess relative risk - Radiation-induced morbidity - Pediatrics

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document