Background: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal
(TAPP) hernia repair with a standard tension-free open mesh repair (open).
Methods: A total of 108 low-risk patients with unilateral (primary or recurrent) or bilateral hernias were randomized to TAPP (group
1 = 52 cases) or open (group 2 = 56 cases). The outcome measures included operating time, complications, postoperative pain,
return to normal activity, operating theater costs, and recurrences.
Results: The mean operative time was longer for the TAPP than for the open group only in unilateral primary hernias. At rest, the
median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was higher for group 1 than group 2 at 48 h postoperatively. Mild to discomforting
pain in the inguinal region after 7 days, night pain after 30 days, and inguinal hardening after 3 months were more frequent
in group 2 than group 1. No significant differences were observed in return to normal activities between the groups. One hernia
recurrence was observed after 1 month in group 1. TAPP was significantly more expensive than open.
Conclusions: TAPP was associated with less postoperative pain than open. The increase in operating theater costs, however, was dramatic
and was not compensated by shorter time away from work. TAPP should not be adopted routinely unless its costs can be drastically
reduced.
Key words: Hernia — Laparoscopic hernia repair — Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair — Transabdominal preperitoneal hernia
repair
Received: 10 June 1997/Accepted: 6 October 1997