Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2009
10.1007/s11999-009-1177-z

Letter to the Editor

Reply to Letter to the Editor

Maiken StillingContact Information, Kjeld Søballe1 and Ole Rahbek1

(1)  Department of Orthopedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, Building 10A, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

Contact Information Maiken Stilling
Email: maiken.stilling@ki.au.dk

Published online: 1 December 2009


Without Abstract
(Re: Stilling M, Nielsen KA, Søballe K, Rahbek O. Clinical comparison of polyethylene wear with zirconia or cobalt-chromium femoral heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res.2009;467:2644–2650.)
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

We thank Doctors Marcel E. Roy and Leo A. Whiteside for their comments regarding our article entitled “Clinical Comparison of Polyethylene Wear with Zirconia or Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Heads” [5], and for contributing their expert knowledge regarding zirconia femoral heads.

Our article exclusively addresses the wear rates of yttria-stabilized zirconia manufactured by Saint Gobain Demarquest (Evreux, France), as stated in the Materials and Methods section. As a consequence, the Discussion and conclusions in our article deal with yttria-stabilized zirconia although this is not spelled out throughout the text. Other studies have similarly focused on yttria-stabilized zirconia [2, 3, 6].

Importantly, Roy and Whiteside bring attention to magnesia-stabilized zirconia, which indeed still is available for orthopaedic applications. Based on the published retrieval study by Roy et al. [4] and interesting new experimental results briefly presented in their commentary, magnesia-stabilized zirconia femoral heads seems to offer a safe, low-wear alternative to the traditional metal-on-polyethylene articulate bearing. However, their observations are based on surface analysis of a limited number of retrieved zirconia ceramic femoral heads (five yttria-stabilized zirconia femoral heads and seven magnesia-stabilized femoral heads), aged a minimum of 5 years and an average of 8 years in vivo [4]. The average roughness of yttria-stabilized zirconia was increased with age while magnesia-stabilized zirconia heads stayed unaffected with age in vivo, and yet most of the zirconia femoral heads in both groups were retrieved owing to wear and osteolysis. They provided no estimate of the polyethylene wear or examination of the counter bearing noncross-linked polyethylene surfaces but concluded magnesia-stabilized zirconia femoral heads to be phase stable and degradation free [4]. Some comments on factors attributing polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and a shorter than expected time of survival in all of the examined retrieved components would have been valuable for clinical recommendations.

Although the experimental results with magnesia-stabilized zirconia seem most favorable, as did the experimental wear-simulator results with yttria-stabilized zirconia femoral heads [1], clinical publications regarding medical-grade magnesia-stabilized zirconia including reports regarding clinical polyethylene wear are sparse, and, to our knowledge, long-term large-scale clinical results (more than 10 years), including data regarding polyethylene wear, are yet to be published. We look forward to seeing these results and encourage continued sharing of knowledge regarding zirconia-on-polyethylene bearing couples.


References

1. Derbyshire B, Fisher J, Dowson D, Hardaker C, Brummitt K. Comparative study of the wear of UHMWPE with zirconia ceramic and stainless steel femoral heads in artificial hip joints. Med Eng Phys. 1994;16:229–236.
CrossRef ChemPort PubMed
 
2. Hernigou P, Bahrami T. Zirconia and alumina ceramics in comparison with stainless-steel heads: polyethylene wear after a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:504–509.
CrossRef ChemPort PubMed
 
3. Kraay MJ, Thomas RD, Rimnac CM, Fitzgerald SJ, Goldberg VM. Zirconia versus Co-Cr femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: early assessment of wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:86–90.
CrossRef PubMed
 
4. Roy ME, Whiteside LA, Katerberg BJ, Steiger JA, Nayfeh T. Not all zirconia femoral heads degrade in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:220–226.
PubMed
 
5. Stilling M, Nielsen KA, Soballe K, Rahbek O. Clinical comparison of polyethylene wear with zirconia or cobalt-chromium femoral heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2644–2650.
SpringerLink PubMed
 
6. von Schewelov T, Sanzen L, Onsten I, Carlsson A, Besjakov J. Total hip replacement with a zirconium oxide ceramic femoral head: a randomised roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1631–1635.