Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
A Comparison of Two Persistent Storage Tools for Implementing a Search Engine
| |
|
A Comparison of Two Persistent Storage Tools for Implementing a Search Engine
Andrea Garratt6 , Mike Jackson6 , Peter Burden6 and Jon Wallis6 
| (6) |
School of Computing & IT, University of Wolverhampton, 35-49 Lichfield Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1EL, UK |
Abstract
This paper compares two Java-based persistent storage mechanisms: a commercially available object-oriented database (OODB)
system and the persistent storage tool PJama [1] on the basis of their suitability for implementing the index component of an experimental World Wide Web search engine called
WWLib-TNG. Persistence is provided to the builder component of the search engine, which constructs a catalogue of Web pages.
The searcher component of the engine searches the catalogue. The implementation of the builder using PJama and using an OODB
were compared with respect to time taken to construct a catalogue, efficient use of disk space and scalability. The implementations
of the searcher were compared on response time and scalability. The comparison showed that for this application PJama performs
better than the OODB. Compared with the OODB, PJama gave 300% better build performance and was more scalable.
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|