Architectures and Idioms: Making Progress in Agent Design
Joanna Bryson3
and Lynn Andrea Stein3 
| (3) |
Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, 545 Technology Square, 02139 Cambridge, MA, USA |
Abstract
This chapter addresses the problem of producing and maintaining progress in agent design. New architectures often hold important
insights into the problems of designing intelligence. Unfortunately, these ideas can be difficult to harness, because on established
projects switching between architectures and languages carries high cost. We propose a solution whereby the research community
takes responsibility for re-expressing innovations as idioms or extensions of one or more standard architectures. We describe
the process and provide an example — the concept of a Basic Reactive Plan. This idiom occurs in several influential agent
architectures, yet in others is difficult to express.We also discuss our proposal’s relation to the the roles of architectures,
methodologies and toolkits in the design of agents.
LAS: also Computers and Cognition Group, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, 1735 Great Plain Avenue, Needham, MA 02492
las@olin.edu
References secured to subscribers.