Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
My Menu
Saved Items

Architectures and Idioms: Making Progress in Agent Design

Joanna BrysonContact Information and Lynn Andrea SteinContact Information

(3)  Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, 545 Technology Square, 02139 Cambridge, MA, USA
Abstract
This chapter addresses the problem of producing and maintaining progress in agent design. New architectures often hold important insights into the problems of designing intelligence. Unfortunately, these ideas can be difficult to harness, because on established projects switching between architectures and languages carries high cost. We propose a solution whereby the research community takes responsibility for re-expressing innovations as idioms or extensions of one or more standard architectures. We describe the process and provide an example — the concept of a Basic Reactive Plan. This idiom occurs in several influential agent architectures, yet in others is difficult to express.We also discuss our proposal’s relation to the the roles of architectures, methodologies and toolkits in the design of agents.
LAS: also Computers and Cognition Group, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, 1735 Great Plain Avenue, Needham, MA 02492 las@olin.edu

Contact Information Joanna Bryson
Email: joanna@ai.mit.edu

Contact Information Lynn Andrea Stein
Email: las@ai.mit.edu
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
Image of the first page of the fulltext

References secured to subscribers.



Export this chapter
Export this chapter as RIS | Text
 
Remote Address: 38.107.191.108 • Server: mpweb18
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)