We studied the nature of feedback given after a miniCEX. We investigated whether the feedback was interactive; specifically,
did the faculty allow the trainee to react to the feedback, enable self-assessment, and help trainees to develop an action
plan for improvement. Finally, we investigated the number of types of recommendations given by faculty. One hundred and seven
miniCEX feedback sessions were audiotaped. The faculty provided at least 1 recommendation for improvement in 80% of the feedback
sessions. The majority of the sessions (61%) involved learner reaction, but in only 34% of the sessions did faculty ask for
self-assessment from the intern and only 8% involved an action plan from the faculty member. Faculty are using the miniCEX
to provide recommendations and often encourage learner reaction, but are underutilizing other interactive feedback methods
of self-assessment and action plans. Programs should consider both specific training in feedback and changes to the miniCEX
form to facilitate interactive feedback.
Key words feedback - direct observation - evaluation
This research was supported in part by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation.
The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of the United States Navy or Department
of Defense.