Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Some Ways that Maps and Diagrams Communicate
| Book Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| Publisher | Springer Berlin / Heidelberg |
| ISSN | 0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online) |
| Volume | Volume 1849/2000 |
| Book | Spatial Cognition II |
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45460-8 |
| Copyright | 2000 |
| ISBN | 978-3-540-67584-6 |
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45460-8_6 |
| Pages | 72-79 |
| Subject Collection | Computer Science |
| SpringerLink Date | Saturday, January 01, 2000 |
| |
|
Some Ways that Maps and Diagrams Communicate
Barbara Tversky4 
| (4) |
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-2130 |
Abstract
Since ancient times, people have devised cognitive artifacts to extend memory and ease information processing. Among them
are graphics, which use elements and the spatial relations among them to represent worlds that are actually or metaphorically
spatial. Maps schematize the real world in that they are two-dimensional, they omit information, they regularize, they use
inconsistent scale and perspective, and they exaggerate, fantasize, and carry messages. With little proding, children and
adults use space and spatial relations to represent abstract relations, temporal, quantitative, and preference, in stereotyped
ways, suggesting that these mappings are cognitively natural. Graphics reflect conceptions of reality, not reality.
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|