Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Reproducibility of Laplacian Wall Thickness Measurements of the Gallbladder with Varying CT Slice Thickness
| |
|
Reproducibility of Laplacian Wall Thickness Measurements of the Gallbladder with Varying CT Slice Thickness
M. N. Prasad1 , M. S. Brown1 , C. Ni1 , D. Margolis1 , M. Douek1 , S. Raman1 , D. Lu1 , J. G. Goldin1 and S. K. Warfield2 
| (1) |
Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA |
| (2) |
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, USA |
Received: 12 January 2008 Revised: 27 February 2008 Accepted: 4 April 2008 Published online: 3 June 2008
Abstract In measuring changes of gallbladder wall thickness using CT, robustness to differences in acquisition protocols including
slice thickness can be important. We have developed an automated technique based on Laplace’s equation to measure the gallbladder
wall thickness using computer tomography (CT). The purpose of this work is to investigate the usefulness of the Laplacian
technique in obtaining gallbladder wall thickness measurements that are reproducible with variations in CT slice thickness.
This study included 2D (2D) and 3D (3D) wall thickness measurements using Laplace’s equation. Ten subjects who had 5 mm (thick)
and 2.5 mm (thin) reconstruction (from a single set of raw data) through the abdomen were randomly selected from a research
database. Their volumetric CT images were acquired using a multidetector GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS–LightSpeed 16 scanner at 120 KVP,
~250 mAs, with standard filter reconstruction algorithm and manually segmented on all CT cross sections by a radiologist.
The inner and outer boundaries of the gallbladder wall were obtained from the segmentation. The thickness of the wall was
quantified by computing the distance between the boundaries for each scan and over the entire volume using Laplace’s equation
from mathematical physics. The distance between the surfaces is found by computing normalized gradients that form a vector
field. The vector fields represent tangent vectors along field lines connecting both boundaries. The Laplacian technique was
compared with the conventional Euclidean distance transformation (EDT) technique using coefficient of variation. EDT results
in an Euclidean distance mapping between the two extracted surfaces. Both techniques were compared in 2D and 3D. For the 2D
and 3D wall thickness measurements, a mean difference of 0.35 and 0.25 mm between thin and thick reconstruction was found
respectively using Laplace’s equation. EDT resulted in a higher mean difference for both 2D and 3D. In addition, a significant
difference in thickness between the Laplacian technique and EDT techniques ( p < 0.001) were obtained. The Laplacian measurement of gallbladder wall showed significantly lower variation compared to EDT
on different CT slice thickness for both 2D and 3D techniques. Hence, proving to be an important technique for obtaining reproducible
wall thickness measurements of the gallbladder using CT.
Keywords CT - Ultrasound - Laplace’s equation - Thickness - Reproducibility
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|