Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Can We Have Confidence in a Tree Representation?
| |
|
Can We Have Confidence in a Tree Representation?
Alain Guénoche6 and Henri Garreta7
| (6) |
IML - CNRS, 163 Av. de Luminy, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9 |
| (7) |
LIM -, Université de la Méditerranée, 163 Av. de Luminy, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9 |
Abstract
A tree representation distance method, applied to any dissimilarity array, always gives a valued tree, even if the tree model
is not appropriate. In the first part, we propose some criteria to evaluate the quality of the computed tree. Some of them
are metric; their values depend on the edge’s lengths. The other ones only depend on the tree topology. In the second part,
we calculate the average and the critical values of these criteria, according to parameters. Three models of distance are
tested using simulations. On the one hand, the tree model, and on the other hand, euclidean distances, and boolean distances.
In each case, we select at random distances fitting these models and add some noise. We show that the criteria values permit
one to differentiate the tree model from the others. Finally, we analyze a distance between proteins and its tree representation
that is valid according to the criteria values.
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|