Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Speeding Up HMM Decoding and Training by Exploiting Sequence Repetitions
| |
|
Speeding Up HMM Decoding and Training by Exploiting Sequence Repetitions
Yury Lifshits1 , Shay Mozes2 , Oren Weimann3 and Michal Ziv-Ukelson4 
| (1) |
California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA |
| (2) |
Department of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912-1910, USA |
| (3) |
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 32 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA |
| (4) |
Computer Science Department, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel |
Received: 10 June 2007 Accepted: 5 November 2007 Published online: 28 November 2007
Abstract
We present a method to speed up the dynamic program algorithms used for solving the HMM decoding and training problems for
discrete time-independent HMMs. We discuss the application of our method to Viterbi’s decoding and training algorithms (IEEE
Trans. Inform. Theory IT-13:260–269, 1967), as well as to the forward-backward and Baum-Welch (Inequalities 3:1–8, 1972) algorithms. Our approach is based on identifying repeated substrings in the observed input sequence. Initially, we show
how to exploit repetitions of all sufficiently small substrings (this is similar to the Four Russians method). Then, we describe
four algorithms based alternatively on run length encoding (RLE), Lempel-Ziv (LZ78) parsing, grammar-based compression (SLP),
and byte pair encoding (BPE). Compared to Viterbi’s algorithm, we achieve speedups of Θ(log n) using the Four Russians method,

using RLE,

using LZ78,

using SLP, and Ω( r) using BPE, where k is the number of hidden states, n is the length of the observed sequence and r is its compression ratio (under each compression scheme). Our experimental results demonstrate that our new algorithms are
indeed faster in practice. We also discuss a parallel implementation of our algorithms.
Keywords HMM - Viterbi - Dynamic programming - Compression
A preliminary version of this paper appeared in Proc. 18th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM), pp. 4–15,
2007.
Y. Lifshits’ research was supported by the Center for the Mathematics of Information and the Lee Center for Advanced Networking.
S. Mozes’ work conducted while visiting MIT.
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|