Institutional Login
Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please
log in
or
register
.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can
help
.
My Menu
Marked Items
Alerts
Order History
Saved Items
All
Favorites
Content Types
All
Publications
Journals
Book Series
Books
Reference Works
Protocols
Subject Collections
Architecture and Design
Behavioral Science
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Business and Economics
Chemistry and Materials Science
Computer Science
Earth and Environmental Science
Engineering
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
Mathematics and Statistics
Medicine
Physics and Astronomy
Professional and Applied Computing
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
English
Deutsch
한국어
日本語
Français
Español
العربية
Русский
Book Chapter
Experimental Genetic Operators Analysis for the Multi-objective Permutation Flowshop
Book Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
ISSN
0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online)
Volume
Volume 2632/2003
Book
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
DOI
10.1007/3-540-36970-8
Copyright
2003
ISBN
978-3-540-01869-8
DOI
10.1007/3-540-36970-8_41
Page
69
Subject Collection
Computer Science
SpringerLink Date
Wednesday, January 01, 2003
Add to marked items
Add to shopping cart
Add to saved items
Permissions & Reprints
Recommend this chapter
PDF (366.3 KB)
Free Preview
Experimental Genetic Operators Analysis for the Multi-objective Permutation Flowshop
Carlos A. Brizuela
8
and Rodrigo Aceves
8
(8)
Computer Science Department, CICESE Research Center, Km 107 Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada, Ensenada, B.C., México
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to show the influence of genetic operators such as crossover and mutation on the performance of a genetic algorithm (GA). The GA is applied to the multi-objective permutation flowshop problem. To achieve our goal an experimental study of a set of crossover and mutation operators is presented. A measure related to the dominance relations of different non-dominated sets, generated by different algorithms, is proposed so as to decide which algorithm is the best. The main conclusion is that there is a crossover operator having the best average performance on a very specific set of instances, and under a very specific criterion. Explaining the reason why a given operator is better than others remains an open problem.
Carlos
A.
Brizuela
Email:
cbrizuel@cicese.mx
Rodrigo
Aceves
Email:
raceves@cicese.mx
Fulltext Preview (Small,
Large
)
References secured to subscribers.
more options
Find
Query Builder
Close
|
Clear
Title (ti)
Summary (su)
Author (au)
ISSN (issn)
ISBN (isbn)
DOI (doi)
And
Or
Not
(
)
* (wildcard)
"" (exact)
Within all content
Within this book series
Within this book
Export this chapter
Export this chapter as
RIS
|
Text
Frequently asked questions
|
General information on journals and books
|
Send us your feedback
|
Impressum
|
Contact
© Springer.
Part of Springer Science+Business Media
Privacy, Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions, © Copyright Information
MetaPress Privacy Policy
Remote Address: 38.107.191.108 • Server: mpweb06
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)