Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Acetabular Loosening Using an Extended Offset Polyethylene Liner
| Journal | Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research |
| Publisher | Springer New York |
| ISSN | 0009-921X (Print) 1528-1132 (Online) |
| Category | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-008-0479-x |
| Subject Collection | Medicine |
| SpringerLink Date | Wednesday, September 10, 2008 |
| |
 |
Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008
Acetabular Loosening Using an Extended Offset Polyethylene Liner
Michael J. Archibeck1 , Tamara Cummins1, Daniel W. Junick1 and Richard E. White Jr.1
| (1) |
New Mexico Center for Joint Replacement Surgery, New Mexico Orthopaedics, 201 Cedar SE, Suite 6600, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA |
Published online: 10 September 2008
Abstract The use of extended offset femoral components and acetabular liners helps restore preoperative offset during hip arthroplasty.
We report a relatively high acetabular component aseptic loosening rate with the use of offset polyethylene liners. We reviewed
1919 primary and 346 revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs). A 7-mm offset acetabular liner was used in 120 of the primary
and 100 of the revision THAs. The aseptic loosening rate in the primary THA group was 0.12% in the standard offset and 4.2%
in the extended offset groups at a minimum of 2 years (mean, 3.6 years; range, 2–9 years) followup. The aseptic loosening
rate in the revision group was 1.7% in the standard and 7% in the extended offset groups at a mean of 4 years (range, 2–9 years)
followup. Although extended offset acetabular liners help restore hip offset, torsional force applied to the implant-bone
interface may have a detrimental effect on fixation. We found a relatively high failure rate in our primary and revision acetabular
components used with an offset liner.
Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
One or more of the authors (MJA, REW) has received funding from Zimmer (Warsaw, IN).
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations
were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study
was obtained.
References
| 1. |
Curtis MJ, Jinnah RH, Wilson VD, Hungerford DS. The initial stability of uncemented acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:372–376.
|
| |
| 2. |
Giori NJ. Offset acetabular components introduce torsion on the implant and may increase the risk of fixation failure. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:89–91.
|
| |
| 3. |
Hurwitz DE, Andriacchi TP. Biomechanics of the hip. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, eds. The Adult Hip. Vol 1. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:80.
|
| |
| 4. |
Kaneko K, Inoue Y, Yanagihara Y, Uta S, Mogami A, Iwase H. The initial fixation of the press-fit acetabular shell—clinical
observation and experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:323–325.
|
| |
| 5. |
Lawless JF. Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1982.
|
| |
| 6. |
McGrory BJ. Acetabular revision with a 7-mm lateral offset component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular
deficiency. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:443–453.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|