Introduction It was postulated that workers, at the sub-acute stage after injury, respond differently to clinical and occupational interventions
offered in a workers’ compensation environment. Individual worker risk of disability, it was further believed, would influence
the effectiveness of early intervention. The objective of the current pilot study was to evaluate return to work (RTW) outcomes
following proactive, combined clinical, occupational and case management-based interdisciplinary early intervention, provided
in a workers’ compensation environment 4–10 weeks of onset of back pain, to workers with medium and high risk for disability.
Methods The project was a controlled study comparing conventional workers’ compensation case management with integrated, interdisciplinary
and multimodal early intervention (hereinafter referred to as “EI”). At baseline, risk status was determined by a validated
Risk for Disability Questionnaire by Carragee et al. (Spine 5(1):24–35, 2005). Seventeen workers at high risk of protracted
disability and 20 workers at moderate risk of disability received conventional case management, and 17 workers assessed at
high risk of protracted disability and 18 workers at moderate risk of disability received the Early Intervention.
Results At 3 months post back pain onset, no statistically significant differences were identified in RTW outcomes between conventional
case management and the Early Intervention. However, by 6 months post back pain onset, workers at high risk of work disability
who received the Early Intervention were significantly more likely to RTW than high risk workers who received conventional
case management. In contrast, moderate risk workers continued to exhibit no statistically significant differences in RTW outcomes.
Conclusion Multimodal Early Intervention in the workers’ compensation case management context is likely effective for workers with sub-acute
back pain who are at high risk of occupational disability. The comprehensive Early Intervention is, however, likely redundant
for workers who are not at high risk for disability and should not be applied indiscriminately. Further studies are required
to determine longer-term Early Intervention outcomes, and to replicate the findings using a randomized control design. Also,
with a larger sample size, it will be possible to determine predictors of occupational outcomes.
Keywords Biopsychosocial - Case management - Cognitive behavioral - Early intervention - Occupational disability - Return to work - Low back pain - (Sub)acute back pain - Musculoskeletal injury - Risk for disability - Predictive factors - Workers’ compensation
The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the view of the Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia/WorkSafeBC.