Institutional Login
Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please
log in
or
register
.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can
help
.
My Menu
Marked Items
Alerts
Order History
Saved Items
All
Favorites
Content Types
All
Publications
Journals
Book Series
Books
Reference Works
Protocols
Subject Collections
Architecture and Design
Behavioral Science
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Business and Economics
Chemistry and Materials Science
Computer Science
Earth and Environmental Science
Engineering
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
Mathematics and Statistics
Medicine
Physics and Astronomy
Professional and Applied Computing
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
English
Deutsch
한국어
日本語
Français
Español
العربية
Русский
Book Chapter
Theory Completion Using Inverse Entailment
Book Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
ISSN
0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online)
Volume
Volume 1866/2000
Book
Inductive Logic Programming
DOI
10.1007/3-540-44960-4
Copyright
2000
ISBN
978-3-540-67795-6
DOI
10.1007/3-540-44960-4_8
Pages
130-146
Subject Collection
Computer Science
SpringerLink Date
Saturday, January 01, 2000
Add to marked items
Add to shopping cart
Add to saved items
Permissions & Reprints
Recommend this chapter
PDF (241.9 KB)
Free Preview
Theory Completion Using Inverse Entailment
Stephen H. Muggleton
2
and Christopher H. Bryant
2
(2)
Department of Computer Science, University of York, York, YO1, 5DD, UK
Abstract
The main real-world applications of Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) to date involve the “Observation Predicate Learning” (OPL) assumption, in which both the examples and hypotheses define the same predicate. However, in both scientific discovery and language learning potential applications exist in which OPL does not hold. OPL is ingrained within the theory and performance testing of Machine Learning. A general ILP technique called “Theory Completion using Inverse Entailment” (TCIE) is introduced which is applicable to non-OPL applications. TCIE is based on inverse entailment and is closely allied to abductive inference. The implementation of TCIE within Progol5.0 is described. The implementation uses contra-positives in a similar way to Stickel’s Prolog Technology Theorem Prover. Progol5.0 is tested on two different data-sets. The first dataset involves a grammar which translates numbers to their representation in English. The second dataset involves hypothesising the function of unknown genes within a network of metabolic pathways. On both datasets near complete recovery of performance is achieved after relearning when randomly chosen portions of background knowledge are removed. Progol5.0’s running times for experiments in this paper were typically under 6 seconds on a standard laptop PC.
Fulltext Preview (Small,
Large
)
References secured to subscribers.
more options
Find
Query Builder
Close
|
Clear
Title (ti)
Summary (su)
Author (au)
ISSN (issn)
ISBN (isbn)
DOI (doi)
And
Or
Not
(
)
* (wildcard)
"" (exact)
Within all content
Within this book series
Within this book
Export this chapter
Export this chapter as
RIS
|
Text
Frequently asked questions
|
General information on journals and books
|
Send us your feedback
|
Impressum
|
Contact
© Springer.
Part of Springer Science+Business Media
Privacy, Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions, © Copyright Information
MetaPress Privacy Policy
Remote Address: 38.107.191.105 • Server: mpweb02
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)