Volume 48, Number 1, 66-69, DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0781-y

Prevalence and Severity of Anal Incontinence in Women With and Without Additional Vaginal Deliveries After a Fourth-Degree Perineal Laceration

Eddie H. M. Sze

View Related Documents

Abstract

PURPOSE  

The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and severity of anal incontinence among women who had undergone no, one, or at least two additional vaginal deliveries after sustaining a fourth-degree sphincter tear as a nullipara.

METHODS  

We conducted a telephone survey to determine our subjectsrsquo anal function. The incontinence score was determined by adding the content (flatus, liquid, and solid stool = 1, 2, and 3 points, respectively) and frequency (less than weekly, weekly, and daily = 1, 2, and 3 points, respectively) points. Severe incontinence is defined as having a score of 5 or 6 points and the incontinence having a severe effect on the subjectrsquos daily activities.

RESULTS  

Of the 148 women interviewed, 52 had undergone zero (Group 1), 60 had had one (Group 2), and 36 had had at least two (Group 3) additional vaginal deliveries. Among the three groups, 20 of 52 (38 percent), 14 of 60 (23 percent), and 10 of 36 (28 percent), respectively, reported anal incontinence (P = 0.208). The proportion that had 1 or 2 points (8/20, 4/14, and 3/10, respectively, P = 0.75) and 3 or 4 points (10/20, 9/14, and 2/10, respectively, P = 0.097) was similar among the three groups. Two of 20 (10 percent), 1 of 14 (7 percent), and 5 of 10 (50 percent), respectively, had a score of 5 or 6 points (P = 0.012). For the three groups, 0 of 20, 0 of 14, and 4 of 10 (40 percent) reported that their incontinence had a severe effect on their daily activities (P = <0.001), and 0 of 52, 0 of 60, and 4 of 36 (11 percent) had severe incontinence (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS  

The proportion that had severe incontinence was significantly higher among women who had undergone at least two additional deliveries.

Fourth-degree tear - Anal incontinence

Supported by a grant from East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine Faculty Research Fund.
Presented at the scientific meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society, San Francisco, California, October 17 to 19, 2002.
Reprints are not available.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document