Migraine is the most common cause of vascular headache and a highly prevalent illness. In the last 20 years, the discovery
of new agents has increased clinical research on migraine. In most of clinical trials that have been conducted, the efficacy
was established using a placebo as a control treatment. The objective of the study reported here was to analyse the response
rate in patients who received a placebo as well as to determine how a number of the methodological factors may affect the
effect of the placebo in clinical trials of acute migraine. Computer-based information searches were conducted on the Medline
database. Data analysis included the outcomes ‘pain relief’, ‘pain-free’, ‘associated symptoms’, ‘recurrence’, ‘patients’
opinion’ about pain relief and ‘adverse events’. Administration route, study design and country in which the study was carried
out were the methodological factors that were analyzed. Meta-analysis was computed using Mantel-Haenszel, and a total of 98
papers were considered in the final analysis. After 2 h, 28.6% of the patients of the placebo group improved and 8.8% were
pain-free. The percentage of pain-free patients was the highest in the placebo and active drug groups in which the placebo
or drug had been administered subcutaneously, in parallel design studies (vs. cross-over trials) and in studies performed
in Europe (vs. North America). Adverse events in the placebo group were significantly higher in studies performed in North
America. These data reinforce the need for knowing the magnitude of the placebo response in each specific situation during
the planning of clinical trials on acute migraine.
Keywords Placebo - Migraine - Clinical trials - Meta-analysis - Methodology