Institutional Login
Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please
log in
or
register
.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can
help
.
My Menu
Marked Items
Alerts
Order History
Saved Items
All
Favorites
Content Types
All
Publications
Journals
Book Series
Books
Reference Works
Protocols
Subject Collections
Architecture and Design
Behavioral Science
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Business and Economics
Chemistry and Materials Science
Computer Science
Earth and Environmental Science
Engineering
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
Mathematics and Statistics
Medicine
Physics and Astronomy
Professional and Applied Computing
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
English
Deutsch
한국어
日本語
Français
Español
العربية
Русский
Book Chapter
How to Model and Verify Concurrent Algorithms for Distributed CSPs
Book Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
ISSN
0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online)
Volume
Volume 1894/2000
Book
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2000
DOI
10.1007/3-540-45349-0
Copyright
2000
ISBN
978-3-540-41053-9
DOI
10.1007/3-540-45349-0_40
Pages
510-514
Subject Collection
Computer Science
SpringerLink Date
Saturday, January 01, 2000
Add to marked items
Add to shopping cart
Add to saved items
Permissions & Reprints
Recommend this chapter
PDF (153.4 KB)
Free Preview
How to Model and Verify Concurrent Algorithms for Distributed CSPs
Markus Hannebauer
5
(5)
German National Research Center for Information Technology FIRST, GMD, Kekuléstr. 7, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
Abstract
Many recent systems tackling Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problems (DCSPs) lack a theoretically founded specification and safety or liveness property proofs. This may be due to the difficulty of modeling and verifying concurrently running threads and their interaction. In this article we will briefly sketch an approach to the modeling and verification of concurrent algorithms tailored to DCSP solving and based on algebraic Petri nets. We will present a realistic case study on distributed agreement finding and state according termination and consistency properties.
An extention of this paper can be found in [1]. Many thanks to Wolfgang Reisig, Armin Wolf and Ulrich Geske for fruitful discussions on this paper.
Markus
Hannebauer
Email:
markus.hannebauer@gmd.de
Fulltext Preview (Small,
Large
)
References secured to subscribers.
more options
Find
Query Builder
Close
|
Clear
Title (ti)
Summary (su)
Author (au)
ISSN (issn)
ISBN (isbn)
DOI (doi)
And
Or
Not
(
)
* (wildcard)
"" (exact)
Within all content
Within this book series
Within this book
Export this chapter
Export this chapter as
RIS
|
Text
Frequently asked questions
|
General information on journals and books
|
Send us your feedback
|
Impressum
|
Contact
© Springer.
Part of Springer Science+Business Media
Privacy, Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions, © Copyright Information
MetaPress Privacy Policy
Remote Address: 38.107.191.108 • Server: mpweb21
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)