Background
For patients to experience the benefits of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), primary care physicians (PCPs) ought to know when
to refer a patient for TJA and/or optimize nonsurgical treatment options for osteoarthritis (OA).
Objective
To evaluate the ability of physicians to make clinical treatment decisions.
Design and participants
A survey, using ten clinical vignettes, of PCPs in Indiana.
Measurements
A test score (range 0 to 10) was computed based on the number of correct answers consistent with published explicit appropriateness
criteria for TJA. We also collected demographic characteristics and physicians’ perceived success rate of TJA in terms of
pain relief and functional improvement.
Results
There were 149 PCPs (response rate = 61%) who participated. The mean test score was 6.5 ± 1.5. Only 17% correctly identified
the published success rate of TJA (i.e., ≥90%). In multivariate analysis, the only physician-related variables associated
with test score were ethnicity, board status, and perceived success rate of TJA. Physicians who were white (P = .001), board-certified (P = .04), and perceived a higher success rate of TJA (P = .004) had higher test scores.
Conclusions
PCP knowledge with respect to guideline-concordant care for OA could be improved, specifically in deciding when to consider
TJA versus optimizing nonsurgical options. Moreover, the perception of the success rate of TJA may influence a clinician’s
decision making.
Key words total joint arthroplasty - primary care physicians - osteoarthritis - decision making
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.