Volume 20, Number 11, 1001-1007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00189.x

Published in partnership with the

Logo

Physician notification of their diabetes patients’ limited health literacy: A randomized, controlled trial

Hilary K. Seligman, Frances F. Wang, Jorge L. Palacios, Clifford C. Wilson, Carolyn Daher, John D. Piette and Dean Schillinger

View Related Documents

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic disease have limited health literacy (HL). Because physicians have difficulty identifying these patients, some experts recommend instituting screening programs in clinical settings. It is unclear if notifying physicians of patients’ limited HL improves care processes or outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether notifying physicians of their patients’ limited HL affects physician behavior, physician satisfaction, or patient self-efficacy.
DESIGN: We screened all patients for limited HL and randomized physicians to be notified if their patients had limited HL skills.
PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three primary care physicians affiliated with a public hospital and 182 diabetic patients with limited HL.
MEASUREMENTS: After their visit, physicians reported their management strategies, satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, and attitudes toward HL screening. We also assessed patients’ self-efficacy, feelings regarding HL screening’s usefulness, and glycemic control.
RESULTS: Intervention physicians were more likely than control physicians to use management strategies recommended for patients with limited HL (OR 3.2, P=.04). However, intervention physicians felt less satisfied with their visits (81% vs 93%, P=.01) and marginally less effective (38% vs 53%, P=.10). Intervention and control patients’ post-visit self-efficacy scores were similar (12.6 vs 12.9, P=6). Sixty-four percent of intervention physicians and 96% of patients felt HL screening was useful.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are responsive to receiving notification of their patients’ limited HL, and patients support the potential utility of HL screening. However, instituting screening programs without specific training and/or system-wide support for physicians and patients is unlikely to be a powerful tool in improving diabetes outcomes.

Key Words  health literacy - screening - diabetes mellitus - physician-patient communication

The authors have no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, to report for this article or this research.
Portions of this work were presented in abstract form at the Society for General Internal Medicine regional (California) and national meetings in 2001 and 2003.
See editorial by Montori, p. 1071
Dr. Seligman was supported by a DHHS-HRSA Research Fellowship Grant 5 D14HP00178-03-00. Dr. Piette is a VA Research Career Scientist. Dr. Schillinger was supported by a NIH Mentored Clinical Scientist Award K-23 RR16539-03, UCSF Hellman Family Research Award, and a Pfizer Inc. Health Literacy Research Award Electronic data were made available through the San Francisco General Hospital GCRC grant M01RR00083-42.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document