Objective
As factors that alter the immune system have been implicated in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) etiology, it is of interest to
explore the association between vaccination and risk of NHL. Results of few epidemiologic studies conducted thus far are inconsistent,
and only one has examined the association by histologic subtype.
Subjects
A population-based, case–control study of 387 patients with NHL and 535 controls conducted in Nebraska between 1999 and 2002.
Methods
Information on vaccination for tetanus, polio, influenza, smallpox, and tuberculosis, as well as important environmental factors,
was collected by telephone interview. Risk was estimated by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting
for confounders.
Results
We found that NHL risk was inversely associated with ever receiving a polio (OR = 0.59, CI = 0.40–0.87) or smallpox (OR = 0.71,
CI = 0.51–0.98) vaccination, and positively associated with influenza vaccination (OR = 1.53, CI = 1.14–2.06). No significant
association was found for tetanus or tuberculosis vaccination. The patterns of association were similar between men and women.
Analysis by histologic subtypes showed that polio vaccination was associated with a lower risk of follicular (OR = 0.54, CI = 0.31–0.92)
and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphomas (OR = 0.29, CI = 0.12–0.69) and smallpox vaccination was associated
with a lower risk of marginal zone lymphoma (OR = 0.41, CI = 0.19–0.88). In contrast, ever receiving an influenza vaccination
was associated with a higher risk of follicular (OR = 1.98, CI = 1.23–3.18) and diffuse large B cell lymphomas (OR = 1.88,
CI = 1.13–3.12).
Conclusion
Risk of NHL is inversely associated with polio and smallpox vaccination and positively associated with influenza vaccination.
These associations appear to differ by histologic subtype.
Keywords Non-Hodgkin lymphoma - Vaccination - Risk factors - Epidemiology
Specific contributions of all authors to published work: HAL provided input into the statistical analyses and drafted and revised this report. BCC designed and oversaw conduct of
the epidemiologic case–control study and provided input into the statistical analyses. DDW was responsible for reviewing cases.
HAL, AJF, AME, BCC, and DDW provided input into the data analyses and interpretation. All authors contributed to the final
version of this report.