Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Shift Changes, Updates, and the On-Call Architecture in Space Shuttle Mission Control
| |
|
Shift Changes, Updates, and the On-Call Architecture in Space Shuttle Mission Control Emily S. Patterson1 and David D. Woods2 | (1) | Institute for Ergonomics, Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory, Ohio State University, 210 Baker Systems, 1971 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, U.S.A. |
| (2) | Institute for Ergonomics, Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory, Ohio State University, 210 Baker Systems, 1971 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, U.S.A. |
Abstract In domains such as nuclear power, industrialprocess control, and space shuttle missioncontrol, there is increased interest inreducing personnel during nominal operations. An essential element in maintaining safeoperations in high risk environments with this`on-call' organizational architecture is tounderstand how to bring called-in practitionersup to speed quickly during escalatingsituations. Targeted field observations wereconducted to investigate what it means toupdate a supervisory controller on the statusof a continuous, anomaly-driven process in acomplex, distributed environment. Sixteenshift changes, or handovers, at the NASAJohnson Space Center were observed during theSTS-76 Space Shuttle mission. The findingsfrom this observational study highlight theimportance of prior knowledge in the updatesand demonstrate how missing updates can leaveflight controllers vulnerable to beingunprepared. Implications for mitigating riskin the transition to `on-call' architecturesare discussed. anomaly - common ground - decision - ethnography - event - knowledge - mutual awareness - observation - plan - shift change - update
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
|
|
|
|
|
|