BACKGROUND: Timeliness of care is 1 of 6 dimensions of quality identified in
Crossing the Quality Chasm. We compared patient and physician perceptions of appropriate timing of visits for common medical problems.
METHODS: This study was conducted at 2 internal medicine clinics at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. Adult patients
and companions, and outpatient General Internists were surveyed. The survey contained 11 clinical scenarios of varying urgency.
Respondents indicated how soon the patient in each scenario should be seen. Responses ranged from that day to 1 to 3 months.
Responses were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-two patients and 46 of 61 physicians responded. For 8 of the 11 scenarios patients felt they should
be seen significantly earlier than physicians. Scenarios involving chronic knee and stomach pain, routine diabetes care, and
hyperlipidemia generated the greatest differences. Patients and physicians agreed on the urgency of scenarios concerning wheezing
in an asthmatic, an ankle injury, and acute pharyngitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients expected to be seen sooner than physicians thought necessary for many common chronic medical conditions, but are
in agreement about timeliness for some acute problems. Understanding patient expectations may help physicians respond to requests
for urgent evaluation of chronic conditions.
Key words access to care - time factors - ambulatory care - primary care
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this article.
This research was presented at the SGIM annual meeting, May 2005.
Funding: Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado.