Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains most valued by urban IsiXhosa-speaking people
| |
|
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains most valued by urban IsiXhosa-speaking people
Jennifer Jelsma1 , Siviwe Mkoka1 and Seyi Ladele Amosun1
| (1) |
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa |
Received: 4 July 2007 Accepted: 8 November 2007 Published online: 15 January 2008
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate and identify aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that are most valued
by IsiXhosa-speaking people resident in underresourced areas of Cape Town, South Africa.
Methodology Fifty-seven domains of HRQoL were identified as important through group discussions with IsiXhosa-speaking people. Participants
randomly selected from the community ( n = 601) and from individuals seeking medical attention at a local clinic ( n = 102) graded the domains on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 for “not at all important” to 10 for “ very important”.
The domains were then mapped to the categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
Results The domains regarded as being most important were Food availability [9.5, standard deviation (SD) = 1.52), Owning a brick
house (9.4, SD = 1.57), Access to medical services (9.4, SD = 1.55) and Family safety (9.4, SD = 1.7). Having no bodily pain
ranked 40th. Environmental Factors were valued significantly more than the other two categories, and those related to Body
Functions were valued higher than domains in the category of Activity and Participation.
Discussion and conclusion Despite being asked specifically to answer the questions in relation to their health status, the participants apparently did
not differentiate between general quality of life (QoL) and specific HRQoL. It appears that members of an underresourced community
regard socioeconomic and service delivery aspects of their lives as integral to their perceived state of health. It may be
that it is not possible to separate out factors relating to general QoL from those specifically related to HRQoL in an underresourced
population, and such populations might not be suitable for inclusion in certain clinical trials where an improvement in HRQoL
is the required outcome. Alternatively, if an HRQoL instrument is to be used to monitor the impact of medical interventions,
the inclusion of Environmental Factors should be considered.
Keywords Health-related quality of life - Underresourced areas - ICF framework - Environmental Factors
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|