Volume 56, Number 1, 7-18, DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1313-3

Published in partnership with the

Logo

Gastroenterology Research Group

Overactive Bladder Drugs and Constipation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

Patrick D. Meek, Samuel D. Evang, Mina Tadrous, Dianne Roux-Lirange, Darren M. Triller and Bora Gumustop

View Related Documents

Abstract

Background  

Anticholinergic drugs are commonly prescribed for symptomatic treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). While recent meta-analyses have characterized the prevalence of dry mouth among patients utilizing OAB medications, prevalence of constipation has not been systematically reviewed.

Aims  

To provide an effect measure for constipation associated with anticholinergic OAB drugs versus placebo.

Methods  

A meta-analysis of trials with darifenacin, fesoterodine, oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine, and trospium was conducted. All randomized, placebo-controlled studies of anticholinergic OAB drugs published in English language and identified in Medline and Cochrane databases were considered for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Those meeting predetermined design characteristics and having sufficient duration (≥2 weeks) were included. Constipation-related data from all included studies were abstracted.

Results  

One hundred two English-language, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were originally identified. Thirty-seven studies were ultimately included in the analysis, involving 19,434 total subjects (12,368 treatment + 7,066 placebo patients). The odds ratios for constipation compared with placebo were as follows: overall [odds ratio (OR) 2.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.82–2.60], tolterodine (OR 1.36, 95% CI = 1.01–1.85), darifenacin (OR 1.93, 95% CI = 1.40–2.66), fesoterodine (OR 2.07, 95% CI = 1.28–3.35), oxybutynin (OR 2.34, 95% CI = 1.31–4.16), trospium (OR 2.93, 95% CI = 2.00–4.28), and solifenacin (OR 3.02, 95% CI = 2.37–3.84).

Conclusions  

Our results demonstrate that patients prescribed anticholinergic OAB drugs are significantly more likely to experience constipation. Differences in muscarinic receptor affinities among individual agents may possibly account for the modest variation in constipation rates observed; however, such a determination warrants additional research.

Keywords  Meta-analysis - Adverse effects - Constipation - Cholinergic antagonists

Preliminary results of this study were presented at the 2008 Digestive Disease Week Meeting, May 20, 2008, San Diego, CA.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document