Large diaphyseal bone defects can be the result of trauma, osteomyelitis, or resection of bone tumors. Structural allografts are used in reconstruction of these bone defects. However, massive cortical allografts are associated with problems like nonunion, infection, and fatigue fractures [2, 11, 20]. An alternative method for fixation and regeneration of new bone in large defects is distraction osteogenesis using external fixation systems. However, this method is technically demanding and has a high complication rate (as much as two to 3.2 difficulties per patient) [13, 18, 19]. Numerous complications are relatively harmless such as pin tract infections (37%–100%) [18, 19] and joint stiffness (39%) [18]. Other more severe complications are persistent pain (17%) [18], fractures at the docking site (21%) [9], limb-length discrepancy (100%) [13], and amputations (10%–11%) [18, 19]. Another disadvantage is the duration of treatment with several additional operative procedures, which requires considerable patient compliance [12, 18, 19]. Therefore, alternative procedures for repair of these large defects are needed.
Impaction bone grafting in revision arthroplasty is effective for repair of large bone defects with survival rates of 90% to 94% after 10 to 18 years followup [25, 27]. With large segmental defects, containment of the impacted bone graft is achieved by metal meshes, which are placed around the original location of the missing bone. The initial stability of the morselized graft is related to the density of the graft, reinforcing the need for firm impaction [4, 14]. This procedure has been used in numerous animal studies in the acetabulum and femur [1, 5] and is performed routinely in revisions of failed hip implants [22, 23, 26, 27]. Histologic analysis of retrieved specimens has revealed remodeling concomitant with gradual ingrowth of the graft, which is mandatory for long-term survival [7, 14, 31]. Initially, cortical grafts obviously have better mechanical properties as compared with morselized bone grafts. However, from a biologic perspective, ingrowth of impacted morselized allograft is superior to structural cortical allograft, which might result in higher incorporation and union rate and thereby superior long-term characteristics [28, 29].
Based on the results with impaction grafting for revision hip arthroplasty, we wondered whether morselized bone graft in a cage could be an alternative for a massive cortical graft in segmental diaphyseal defect reconstructions. Using such a goat model, we asked (1) if the goats regained a normal walking pattern; (2) if the reconstructions healed radiographically; (3) if the strengths of the two reconstruction methods (morselized and cortical grafts) differed in a torsion test; and (4) if the histologic appearance of the two graft types differed after incorporation.
We used 12 Dutch milk goats with 24 femurs (female, Capra Hircus Sana; weight range, 57–64 kg), dividing the 24 femurs into four groups of six femurs (cage reconstruction, cortical graft reconstruction, nonoperated side of the cage group, nonoperated side of the cortical group). We performed a power analysis based on the relevant variable torsional strength. The variation was set at 8.75 Nm, which was based on results of a pilot study and on previous experiments in the femur of goats [15]. The difference in torsional strengths between groups was set at 15 Nm, which is approximately 15% of the normal strength. The relevance of this difference for prediction of fracture risk is difficult because in the test animals, the central nail is still in situ during daily activity, which will contribute substantially to the torsional strength. The expected variation in a group and the difference between groups led to a group size of six goats in this study. All animals were skeletally mature.
After the operative procedure, the goats were kept in a hammock for 1 week to prevent postoperative complications and improve wound healing. After the first week, they were allowed unlimited weightbearing. After 2 weeks, the animals were transported from the central animal facility to an outdoor farm. Temgesic (Buprenorfine) at a rate of 0.018 mL/kg was used as an analgesic three times a day for the first 2 days after surgery and thereafter when necessary. To assess new bone formation on histologic sections, each goat received fluorochromes, a subcutaneous injection of calcein green solution (20 mg/kg) at 13 weeks postoperatively for 2 days, and alizarin (30 mg/kg) solution for 2 days before the animals were euthanized.
Radiographs were taken 0, 12, and 26 weeks postoperatively using general anesthesia. The lateral and anteroposterior views of the femur were judged (by BS, MWM) for callus formation, alignment, fixation failure, and disappearance of the host bone-graft junction. The gait of the goats was monitored with the score originally developed by Ypma, in which 0 = not used at all, 1 = supported incidentally, 2 = loaded in a standing position and incidentally while walking, 3 = loaded in a standing position and walking but with a limp, and 4 = normal walking and standing pattern [21].
After 26 weeks, all goats were euthanized using an injection of 20 mL of 200 mg na-pentobarbital/mL into the jugular vein. The operated and contralateral femora were removed and dissected free from all soft tissues. Our institution approved the animal protocol for this investigation, and all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
After removal of the nail and screw fixation, biomechanical and histologic analyses were performed on the same specimens. The proximal and distal ends of the operated and contralateral femurs were embedded in acrylic cement (AutoPlast; Candulor AG, Wangen, Switzerland) in such a way that a diaphyseal segment, with the former defect located in the center, was free with a margin of 3 cm distal and proximal to the former osteotomy site. The specimens were mounted in a Materials Testing System machine (MTS GMBH, Berlin, Germany), in which the distal femur in cement was loaded in external torsion and the proximal cemented end of the femur was fixated except for axial translation. Throughout the experiment, the specimens were kept moist with Ringer’s lactate (0.9%) at a room temperature of 20° C. All femora were tested for torsion to failure at a rate of 2° per second [15]. The parameter chosen to reflect torsion strength was torque at failure. Torsion strength of the operated femur was expressed as a percentage of torque at failure relative to the contralateral, nonoperated femur of the same animal. Therefore, 100% torsional strength indicated the same strength as the intact case. On the first noticeable crack in the bone, the test was immediately stopped to allow histologic analysis of the whole intact structure.
All sections from each reconstruction were evaluated (LD, PB) by light microscopy, including fluorescence microscopy, for a qualitative assessment of the incorporation process. The quantification of the total bone area inside and outside the cage (only in the cage group) was performed on three slices at equal distance from each other (spaced approximately 875 μm from each other) resulting in one level exactly in the center of the defect and two between the center and osteotomy planes. These cross sections were photographed digitally with an 8-megapixel camera at low magnification and mounted in the computer into a composition of the entire slide. With a digital image analysis system (Soft Imaging GmBH, Münster, Germany), the surface area of the bone inside and outside the cage was measured. In addition, the extent of necrosis in the structural graft was quantified. In each cross section, in four images (one in each quadrant) at a magnification of 10×, the surface area of new bone was measured interactively on digitized images and expressed as a percentage of the surface area of the total bone area. In nonstained thick sections, the distance of bone ingrowth was quantified in four locations in each section based on the penetration of fluorescence labels of calcein green (front at 13 weeks) and alizarin (front at 26 weeks). The torsional strength of the four groups (cage reconstruction, cortical graft reconstruction, nonoperated side of the cage group, and nonoperated side of the cortical group) was compared using an analysis of variance test to show differences between groups followed by a post hoc t-test (Tukey).
All 12 animals in both intervention groups were mobilized and regained normal gait 2 weeks after mobilization (score of 4).
The mean failure torque was similar (p = 0.77) between the reconstructions with cortical graft (52.8 ± 14.4 Nm) and the impacted graft (57.5 ± 9.6 Nm). All specimens showed a rather linear pattern on the torque versus angular displacement curves up to the moment of failure (spiral fracture). The mean failure torque of the massive cortical reconstructions and of the cage groups was 60.3% and 66.6%, respectively, lower than the failure torque of the contralateral femurs (93.5 ± 14.8 Nm and 86.9 ± 5.9 Nm; p = 0.017 and p = 0.002, respectively).
Large diaphyseal bone defects resulting from trauma, osteomyelitis, or resection of bone tumors often require reconstruction. In many of these situations structural allografts are used for large defections. However, massive cortical allografts are associated with various complications including nonunion, infection, and fatigue fractures [2, 11, 20]. We compared reconstructions of large segmental diaphyseal bone defects in goats with a structural autograft to reconstruction with impacted morselized bone graft. We focused on the clinical performance, on the radiographic healing, on the mechanical properties of the reconstructions, and on the histologic appearance of the two graft types.
This study has some limitations. In goats, the height of the defect was 3.5 cm, which is a critically sized defect, but only approximately 20% of the length of the goat femur. In patients, larger reconstructions of as much as 15 to 20 cm are performed regularly, which will influence the primary stability and possibly limit the use of this technique. Moreover, in patients, the healing capacity will be compromised by trauma, resection of the periosteum, or adjuvant therapy, and the fit of particularly the structural graft may be less optimal than in this study [8]. The number of goats in this study was rather low which did not allow any conclusions regarding differences between impacted graft and structural graft. Finally, goats may not show any discomfort after a surgical procedure because this would make them vulnerable to predators and they may walk effectively on three limbs. Therefore the loading patterns in goats are less informative compared with bipedal humans.
The radiographic unions in all goats matched the torsion tests because all femurs had torsion strength on the order of 60%, whereas the torsion strength of nonunions is reportedly approximately 20% [9]. Relative to allografts, autografts have generally superior biologic properties, which may have contributed to the optimal union with the host bone in the structural graft group [32]. The location of callus in the cage group was different from the callus around the structural grafts. In the cage, more bone was formed ventrally outside the cage. Probably this is an effect of the changed loading conditions during the initial phase of the incorporation process, in which the ventral part is probably more loaded than the dorsal part. This might have induced a callus outside the mesh at this location. After the formation of this new bone, stress shielding by the bone and by the load transmitted through the mesh, which is in this stage intimately connected with the bone, might have been responsible for the formation of an osteopenic area in the dorsocentral part inside the cage [20, 21, 24].
The radiographs of structural graft specimens showed the callus formation appeared directly related to the width of the intramedullary canal. Although small allograft chips were used to facilitate filling of the small space between the graft and the nail, in three goats with a wider intramedullary canal, the fit of the nail directly postoperatively was less optimal and this has led to more callus formation. Fracture healing studies suggest unstable fractures induce more callus [12, 16]. The callus thus might be induced by instability and resulting micromotion during the healing period. These results show the importance of a perfect fit of the central rod in the femoral canal. For the future, clinical well-fitting or custom-made nails are advocated.
Another option to provide more stability is to add an extra rigid fixation plate, which might lead to better healing [3]. The segmental diaphyseal defect may have been fixed with such an external plate, but screws then have to be inserted in necrotic bone and screw holes act as stress risers in these cases [33]. Therefore, a locking nail concept seemed the best choice.
The major clinical difference with revision arthroplasty is the direction of the load applied on the graft. The load in revision arthroplasty is induced by a subsiding conical-shaped stem, which generates mainly hoop and compressive stresses in the graft. In the segmental reconstruction, the dynamized fixation of the intramedullary nail results in primarily compressive stress in the graft material. As all goats survived the study period well, our experience suggests initial stability was adequate for direct load-bearing. The load may have had a beneficial effect on the incorporation process. Moreover, the stem in revision hip arthroplasty is fixated in the graft reconstruction. In reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect, the central rod has the same function as the stem in a revision situation but is fixed proximally and distally, which will reduce the bending forces in the graft material as compared with the hip situation.
The torsion strength of the massive cortical graft and cage reconstruction appeared to be 60% and 67% of the normal value after 6 months, respectively. As a result of the limited number of animals included in this study, we were unable to show differences between the two groups. Segmental defects in other animal models reconstructed with cortical autografts reportedly regained 50% in torsion strength after 6 months and nearly normal torsion strength after 1 year [9, 10]. The observations in these studies are in concordance with the results in our model.
The incorporation pattern in the structural graft was similar to that published for dogs [10]. In our study, approximately 20% of the necrotic bone was revitalized by creeping substitution. In dogs, remodeling of 60% of a cortical fibula autograft was found after 1 year [10]. In patients, massive cortical human allografts reportedly unite slowly and more periosteal bone is formed than internally repaired, which was only 20% of the graft by 5 years. However, this relatively slow revitalization probably is compromised by therapies for the disease process [11].
Although the porosity of the morselized graft will decrease during impaction, it still is less dense than the structural cortical graft [6]. The relative open structure of the cages and the impacted bone graft facilitate ingrowth and revascularization in large bone defects [5]. Resorption of morselized bone graft is followed in all animal models by replacement of new bone. In the cage group, the original graft was resorbed completely and replaced by new bone, which is in concordance with previous studies in which morselized bone grafts in reconstructions remodel into healthy bone if applied under loaded conditions [17, 24, 25, 34, 35]. A retrieval analysis of failed cage reconstructions, in which the morselized bone was stress-shielded by the design of the cage, showed only 30% viable bone in the cages [30]. In the long term, it seems necessary to load the morselized bone grafts to induce new bone with optimal quantity and quality [34]. In our model, this load was applied continuously by the locking nails, which did not reach the end of their dynamization stage. Load theoretically could lead to micromotions at the implant-bone interface during the remodeling phase. However, two long-term reports describing reconstructions with loaded morselized graft around a hip implant show very favorable results, which suggests that micro-motions are not large enough to be detrimental [14, 26].
Our data showed a cage filled with impacted morselized graft was adequate to reconstruct and heal a segmental diaphyseal bone defect in a goat femur allowing full weightbearing. The reconstruction of segmental diaphyseal bone defects using a cage with a morselized graft had better biologic characteristics compared with a structural cortical autograft. The mechanical properties after incorporation were not different. A cage filled with a mechanically loaded morselized graft is a promising alternative for the massive cortical graft in reconstruction of large diaphyseal defects in an animal model.










