Rationale
Smokers report pleasant reactions to viewing cigarettes, suggesting that smoking cues may be appetitive in nature. Two studies
have investigated this hypothesis through physiological assessment. The first study found that smoking cues were physiologically
appetitive in nature, with dampened startle response to smoking pictures in comparison to neutral pictures. The second found
that smoking pictures did not modulate the startle response, suggesting such cues may not be physiologically appetitive.
Objective
The goal of the present study was to further investigate how participants’ motivation to quit smoking might modulate responses
to smoking cues.
Materials and methods
Twenty-two nicotine-dependent smokers viewed standardized pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and smoking pictures. Eleven of the
subjects reported no intent to quit (precontemplators) and 11 reported planning to quit within the next 6 months (contemplators).
Acoustic startle probes were randomly administered while subjects viewed the pictures, and eyeblink startle magnitude was
measured with electromyography (EMG).
Results
As a whole, participants exhibited dampened startle responses during smoking pictures, relative to unpleasant pictures. Precontemplators
showed robust startle inhibition to smoking pictures, in comparison to both neutral and unpleasant pictures. Contemplators,
however, showed blunted unpleasant picture augmentation and a lack of startle inhibition for pleasant pictures.
Conclusion
These findings are consistent with the idea that smoking pictures are appetitive in nature. Furthermore, they suggest that
smokers at a later stage of change may exhibit a lesser response.
Keywords Smoking cues - Affective modulation - Acoustic startle reflex - Nicotine - Stage of change - Transtheoretical - Drug cue