Volume 51, Number 5, 853-861, DOI: 10.1007/s00125-008-0951-x

Published in partnership with the

Logo

European Association for the Study of Diabetes

Impaired fasting glycaemia vs impaired glucose tolerance: similar impairment of pancreatic alpha and beta cell function but differential roles of incretin hormones and insulin action

K. Færch, A. Vaag, J. J. Holst, C. Glümer, O. Pedersen and K. Borch-Johnsen

View Related Documents

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis  

The impact of strategies for prevention of type 2 diabetes in isolated impaired fasting glycaemia (i-IFG) vs isolated impaired glucose tolerance (i-IGT) may differ depending on the underlying pathophysiology. We examined insulin secretion during OGTTs and IVGTTs, hepatic and peripheral insulin action, and glucagon and incretin hormone secretion in individuals with i-IFG (n = 18), i-IGT (n = 28) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 20).

Methods  

Glucose tolerance status was confirmed by a repeated OGTT, during which circulating insulin, glucagon, glucose-dependent insulinotrophic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels were measured. A euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp with [3–3H]glucose preceded by an IVGTT was performed.

Results  

Absolute first-phase insulin secretion during IVGTT was decreased in i-IFG (p = 0.026), but not in i-IGT (p = 0.892) compared with NGT. Hepatic insulin sensitivity was normal in i-IFG and i-IGT individuals (p ≥ 0.179). Individuals with i-IGT had peripheral insulin resistance (p = 0.003 vs NGT), and consequently the disposition index (DI; insulin secretion×insulin sensitivity) during IVGTT (DIIVGTT)) was reduced in both i-IFG and i-IGT (p < 0.005 vs NGT). In contrast, the DI during OGTT (DIOGTT) was decreased only in i-IGT (p < 0.001), but not in i-IFG (p = 0.143) compared with NGT. Decreased levels of GIP in i-IGT (p = 0.045 vs NGT) vs increased levels of GLP-1 in i-IFG (p = 0.013 vs NGT) during the OGTT may partially explain these discrepancies. Basal and post-load glucagon levels were significantly increased in both i-IFG and i-IGT individuals (p ≤ 0.001 vs NGT).

Conclusions/interpretation  

We propose that differentiated preventive initiatives in prediabetic individuals should be tested, targeting the specific underlying metabolic defects.

Keywords  Disposition index - Glucagon - Impaired fasting glycaemia - Impaired glucose tolerance - Incretin hormones - Insulin secretion - Insulin sensitivity - Pathophysiology - Prediabetes

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document