Objective
To assess the effect of baseline variables, including treatment, on clinical cure and survival rates in patients with Gram-positive, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).Design
Retrospective analysis of two randomized, double-blind studies.Setting
Multinational study with 134 sites.Patients
544 patients with suspected Gram-positive VAP, including 264 with documented Gram-positive VAP and 91 with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) VAP.Interventions
Linezolid 600 mg or vancomycin 1 g every 12 h for 7–21 days, each with aztreonam.Measurements and results
Clinical cure rates assessed 12–28 days after the end of therapy and excluding indeterminate or missing outcomes significantly favored linezolid in the Gram-positive and MRSA subsets. Logistic regression showed that linezolid was an independent predictor of clinical cure with odds ratios of 1.8 for all patients, 2.4 for Gram-positive VAP, and 20.0 for MRSA VAP. Kaplan-Meier survival rates favored linezolid in the MRSA subset. Logistic regression showed that linezolid was an independent predictor of survival with odds ratios of 1.6 for all patients, 2.6 for Gram-positive VAP, and 4.6 for MRSA VAP.Conclusions
Initial linezolid therapy was associated with significantly better clinical cure and survival rates than was initial vancomycin therapy in patients with MRSA VAP.Keywords Linezolid - Vancomycin - Gram-positive pneumonia - Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
- Mechanical ventilation - Regression analysis
This study was supported by a grant from Pharmacia Corporation, Peapack, N.J., USA
An editorial regarding this article can be found in the same issue (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2135-y)