Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, Volume 3424/2005, 756-759, DOI: 10.1007/11423409_16

On the PET Workshop Panel “Mix Cascades Versus Peer-to-Peer: Is One Concept Superior?”

Rainer Böhme, George Danezis, Claudia Díaz, Stefan Köpsell and Andreas Pfitzmann

View Related Documents

Abstract

Editors’ note. Following the panel discussion on Mix Cascades versus P2P at PET 2004, we invited the original panel proposers to write a summary of the discussion for the proceedings. This is their contribution.
After almost two decades of research on anonymous network communication the development has forked into two main directions, namely Mix cascades and peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. As these design options have implications on the achievable anonymity and performance, this paper aims to elaborate the advantages and disadvantages of either concept. After clarifying the scope of the discussion, we present arguments for Mix cascades and P2P designs on multiple areas of interest: the level of anonymity, the incentives to cooperate, aspects of availability, and performance issues. Pointed thesis and antithesis are given for both sides, before a final synthesis tries to articulate the status quo of the discussion.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document