Editors’ note. Following the panel discussion on Mix Cascades versus P2P at PET 2004, we invited the original panel proposers
to write a summary of the discussion for the proceedings. This is their contribution.
After almost two decades of research on anonymous network communication the development has forked into two main directions,
namely Mix cascades and peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. As these design options have implications on the achievable anonymity
and performance, this paper aims to elaborate the advantages and disadvantages of either concept. After clarifying the scope
of the discussion, we present arguments for Mix cascades and P2P designs on multiple areas of interest: the level of anonymity,
the incentives to cooperate, aspects of availability, and performance issues. Pointed thesis and antithesis are given for
both sides, before a final synthesis tries to articulate the status quo of the discussion.