Published in partnership with the

Logo

Club Jules Gonin

Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study

Mona Pache, Sonja Wilmsmeyer, Sonja Lautebach and Jens Funk

View Related Documents

Abstract

Background  

Various sources of error, including central corneal thickness (CCT) and structural corneal rigidity, have been proposed for Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) is a novel device designed for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements assumed to be largely independent of CCT and corneal curvature. We compared DCT with GAT in eyes with normal corneas of various thickness.

Methods  

We prospectively measured IOP using DCT and GAT in random order in 100 eyes of 100 subjects (M:F=46:54; mean age 42±19, range 23–88 years).

Results  

Mean DCT values were about 1mmHg higher than GAT readings (16±3 vs 15±3 mmHg, p=0.001). Bland–Altman analysis of individual pairs of DCT and GAT measurements revealed a bias of –1.0 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): ±1.2]. Neither GAT nor DCT showed a significant correlation with CCT (533±48, range 399–641 mgrm).

Conclusions  

In eyes with normal corneas, DCT allows suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT. Comparison of DCT with intracameral manometry is desirable in the future.

Keywords  Intraocular pressure - Pascal dynamic contour tonometry - Goldmann applanation tonometry - Central corneal thickness - Pachymetry - Glaucoma

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document