OBJECTIVE: The patient-clinician relationship is a central feature of primary care, and recent developments in the delivery of health
care have tended to limit continuity of care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent to which continuity of
care and other factors are related to patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, mailed questionnaire study.
SETTING: Primary care clinics at 7 Veterans Affairs medical centers.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=21,689) participating in the Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project who returned the baseline Seattle Outpatient Satisfaction
Questionnaire (SOSQ).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We evaluated the association between self-reported continuity and satisfaction, after adjusting for characteristics of patients,
clinics, and providers. The humanistic scale of the SOSQ measures patient satisfaction with communication skills and humanistic
qualities of providers, whereas the organizational scale measures satisfaction with delivery of health care services. The
mean adjusted humanistic score for patients who reported always seeing the same provider was 17.3 (95% confidence interval
[CI], 15.5 to 19.1) points higher than for those who rarely saw the same provider. Similarly, the mean adjusted organizational
score was 16.3 (95% CI, 14.5 to 18.1) points higher for patients who always saw the same provider compared to rarely. Demographic
factors, socioeconomic status, health status, clinic site, and patient utilization of services were all associated with both
the adjusted humanistic and organizational scores of the SOSQ.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported continuity of care is strongly associated with higher patient satisfaction. This suggests that improving continuity
of care may improve patient satisfaction with providers as well as with their health care organization.
Key words patient satisfaction - health services research - quality of care - questionnaire design - linear models
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose, and there are no financial or personal relationships among the authors that
would affect the results of this study.
The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veteran Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Service
grants SDR 96-002, IIR 99-376, RCD 99-319, and RCD 02-170.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department
of Veterans Affairs.