Background
E75, a HER2/neu immunogenic peptide, is expressed in breast cancer (BCa). We have performed clinical trials of E75 + GM-CSF vaccine in disease-free,
node-positive and node-negative BCa patients at high recurrence risk and recurrences were noted in both control and vaccine
groups.
Methods
Among the 186 BCa patients enrolled, 177 completed the study. Patients were HLA typed; the HLA-A2+/A3+ patients were vaccinated; HLA-A2−/A3− patients were followed as controls. Standard clinicopathological factors, immunologic response to the vaccine, and recurrences
were collected and assessed.
Results
The control group recurrence rate was 14.8 and 8.3% in the vaccinated group (P = 0.17). Comparing the 8 vaccinated recurrences (V-R) to the 88 vaccinated nonrecurrent patients (V-NR), the V-R group had
higher nodal stage (≥N2: 75 vs. 5%, P = 0.0001) and higher grade tumors (%grade 3: 88 vs. 31%, P = 0.003). The V-R group did not fail to respond immunologically as noted by equivalent dimer responses and post-DTH responses.
Compared to control recurrent patients (C-R), V-R patients trended toward higher-grade tumors and hormone-receptor negativity.
C-R patients had 50% bone-only recurrences, compared to V-R patients with no bone-only recurrences (P = 0.05). Lastly, V-R mortality rate was 12.5% compared with 41.7% for the C-R group (P = 0.3).
Conclusions
The vaccinated patients who recurred had more aggressive disease compared to V-NR patients. V-R patients had no difference
in immune response to the vaccine either in vitro or in vivo. V-R patients, when compared to C-R patients, trended towards
more aggressive disease, decreased recurrence rates, decreased mortality, and no bone-only recurrences.
Keywords Vaccine - E75 peptide - Preventive - Recurrence - Pathologic patterns - Immunologic response
Supported by the United States Military Cancer Institute and the Department of Clinical Investigation at Walter Reed Army
Medical Center. Funded primarily by the Clinical Breast Care Project. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the
private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of the Army,
the Department of the Navy, or the Department of Defense. This work represents original research that has not been submitted
elsewhere for publication.