Volume 11, Number 2, 79-87, DOI: 10.1007/s11307-008-0148-1

Published in partnership with

Logo

WMIS and ESMI

Imaging and Pharmacokinetics of 64Cu-DOTA-HB22.7 Administered by Intravenous, Intraperitoneal, or Subcutaneous Injection to Mice Bearing Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Xenografts

Shiloh M. Martin, Robert T. O’Donnell, David L. Kukis, Craig K. Abbey, Hayes McKnight, Julie L. Sutcliffe and Joseph M. Tuscano

View Related Documents

Abstract

Purpose  

The aim of the study is to compare the tumor-specific targeting, pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution of 64Cu-DOTA-HB22.7 when administered to xenograft-bearing mice intravenously (IV), intraperitoneally (IP), and subcutaneously (SQ).

Procedures  

Mice bearing human non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) xenografts were injected IV, IP, or SQ with 64Cu-DOTA-HB22.7. Xenograft targeting was evaluated by micro positron emission tomography (microPET) and confirmed by organ biodistribution studies. Blood measurements of 64Cu were performed to determine the pharmacokinetics and clearance of 64Cu-DOTA-HB22.7.

Results  

64Cu-DOTA-HB22.7 demonstrated equivalent tumor targeting within 24–48 h, regardless of the route of administration. Organ biodistribution confirmed tumor-specific targeting. Blood pharmacokinetics demonstrated that 64Cu-DOTA-HB22.7 accessed the bloodstream after IP and SQ administration to a similar degree as IV administration, albeit at a slower rate.

Conclusions  

These findings establish 64Cu-DOTA-HB22.7 as a potential radioimmunotherapeutic and/or NHL-specific imaging agent. These findings provide evidence that IP and SQ administration can achieve results equivalent to IV administration and may lead to more efficient, reproducible treatment plans for antibody-based therapeutics.

Key words  HB22.7 - CD22 - Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma - PET -  64Cu

Julie L. Sutcliffe and Joseph M. Tuscano—these authors jointly supervised this study.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document